Literature DB >> 17223426

Usefulness of preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide level for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Nicolas Lellouche1, Carlos De Diego, David A Cesario, Marmar Vaseghi, Barbara Natterson Horowitz, Aman Mahajan, Isaac Wiener, Noel G Boyle, Gregg C Fonarow, Kalyanam Shivkumar.   

Abstract

Nearly 1/3 of patients with heart failure (HF) fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of preimplantation brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting the clinical response to CRT. We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients who underwent CRT. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, who were not on inotropic medications, had left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and QRS duration >130 ms were included in the study. CRT response in patients who survived at 6-month follow-up was defined as no HF hospitalization and improvement of > or =1 grades in the New York Heart Association classification. BNP assays were performed before implantation and at 6-month follow-up. Patients had ischemic (47%) or nonischemic (53%) cardiopathy. Responders (n = 107) and nonresponders (n = 57) had similar baseline characteristics. Cardiac death and hospitalization for HF occurred in 5 (4.7%) and 18 (31.6%) patients, respectively. CRT responders compared with nonresponders exhibited higher preimplantation BNP levels (800 +/- 823 vs 335 +/- 348 pg/ml, p = 0.0002) and a significant reduction in the QRS duration after implantation (-6 +/- 34 vs +7 +/- 32 ms, p = 0.048). The preimplantation BNP was the only independent predictor of the CRT response (p = 0.001). A BNP value > or =447 pg/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 79% in identifying CRT response. In a subgroup of 41 patients who underwent Doppler tissue imaging analysis, the preimplantation BNP was higher in patients presenting with intraventricular dyssynchrony (845 +/- 779 vs 248 +/- 290 pg/ml, p = 0.04). In conclusion, the preimplantation BNP value independently predicts CRT response and was superior to QRS duration reduction in identifying CRT responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17223426     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Development of a biomarker panel to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results from the SMART-AV trial.

Authors:  Francis G Spinale; Timothy E Meyer; Craig M Stolen; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Stacia M DeSantis; Nicholas Wold; John F Beshai; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Biomarkers in electrophysiology: role in arrhythmias and resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Abhishek Bose; Quynh A Truong; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Association of BNP and Troponin Levels with Outcome among Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients.

Authors:  Alaa A Shalaby; William T Abraham; Gregg C Fonarow; Malcolm M Bersohn; John Gorcsan; Li-Yin Lee; Jasmina Halilovic; Samir Saba; Alan Maisel; Jagmeet P Singh; Ali Sonel; Alan Kadish
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Association of QRS narrowing with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Katerina K Naka; Alawi Alsheikh-Ali; Gary Tse; Konstantinos P Letsas; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Tong Liu; Cynthia Yeung; Michael Efremidis; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Adrian Baranchuk; Stavros Stavrakis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation.

Authors:  Helder Pereira; Tom A Jackson; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Cheng Yao; Benjamin Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Baldeep Sidhu; Jaswinder Gill; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Julien Magne; Michelle Dubois; Jean Champagne; Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; François Philippon; Gilles O'Hara; Mario Sénéchal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.062

8.  Extracellular RNAs: development as biomarkers of human disease.

Authors:  Joseph F Quinn; Tushar Patel; David Wong; Saumya Das; Jane E Freedman; Louise C Laurent; Bob S Carter; Fred Hochberg; Kendall Van Keuren-Jensen; Matt Huentelman; Robert Spetzler; M Yashar S Kalani; Jorge Arango; P David Adelson; Howard L Weiner; Roopali Gandhi; Beatrice Goilav; Chaim Putterman; Julie A Saugstad
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 9.  Usefulness of Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad H Asgardoon; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani; Alborz Sherafati
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2020
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.