Literature DB >> 17222707

Nuclear transfer: preservation of a nuclear genome at the expense of its associated mtDNA genome(s).

Emma J Bowles1, Keith H S Campbell, Justin C St John.   

Abstract

Nuclear transfer technology has uses across theoretical and applied applications, but advances are restricted by continued poor success rates and health problems associated with live offspring. Development of reconstructed embryos is dependent upon numerous interlinking factors relating both to the donor cell and the recipient oocyte. For example, abnormalities in gene expression following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) have been linked with an inability of the oocyte cytoplasm to sufficiently epigenetically reprogram the nucleus. Furthermore, influences on the propagation of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) could be of great importance in determining the early developmental potential of NT embryos and contributing to their genetic identity. mtDNA encodes some of the subunits of the electron transfer chain, responsible for cellular ATP production. The remaining subunits and those factors required for mtDNA replication, transcription and translation are encoded by the nucleus, necessitating precise intergenomic communication. Additionally, regulation of mtDNA copy number, via the processes of mtDNA transcription and replication, is essential for normal preimplantation embryo development and differentiation. Unimaternal transmission following natural fertilization usually results in the presence of a single identical population of mtDNA, homoplasmy. Heteroplasmy can result if mixed populations of mtDNA genomes co-exist. Many abnormalities observed in NT embryos, fetuses, and offspring may be caused by deficiencies in OXPHOS, perhaps resulting in part from heteroplasmic mtDNA populations. Additionally, incompatibilities between the somatic nucleus and the cytoplast may be exacerbated by increased genetic divergence between the two genomes. It is important to ensure that the nucleus is capable of sufficiently regulating mtDNA, requiring a level of compatibility between the two genomes, which may be a function of evolutionary distance. We suggest that abnormal expression of factors such as TFAM and POLG in NT embryos will prematurely drive mtDNA replication, hence impacting on early development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17222707     DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)77010-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

Review 1.  Transmission of mitochondrial DNA diseases and ways to prevent them.

Authors:  Joanna Poulton; Marcos R Chiaratti; Flávio V Meirelles; Stephen Kennedy; Dagan Wells; Ian J Holt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 2.  Mitochondrial DNA transmission and confounding mitochondrial influences in cloned cattle and pigs.

Authors:  Kumiko Takeda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-10

3.  Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer is dependent on compatible mitochondrial DNA and reprogramming factors.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Richard Kelly; Amy Peters; Helena Fulka; Adam Dickinson; Daniel A Mitchell; Justin C St John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The generation of live offspring from vitrified oocytes.

Authors:  L Gabriel Sanchez-Partida; Richard D W Kelly; Huseyin Sumer; Camden Y Lo; Rotem Aharon; Michael K Holland; Moira K O'Bryan; Justin C St John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cattle phenotypes can disguise their maternal ancestry.

Authors:  Kanokwan Srirattana; Kieren McCosker; Tim Schatz; Justin C St John
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in ovine fetuses and sheep cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jörg P Burgstaller; Pamela Schinogl; Andras Dinnyes; Mathias Müller; Ralf Steinborn
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Mitochondrial DNA haplotypes induce differential patterns of DNA methylation that result in differential chromosomal gene expression patterns.

Authors:  William T Lee; Xin Sun; Te-Sha Tsai; Jacqueline L Johnson; Jodee A Gould; Daniel J Garama; Daniel J Gough; Matthew McKenzie; Ian A Trounce; Justin C St John
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 8.  Extranuclear Inheritance of Mitochondrial Genome and Epigenetic Reprogrammability of Chromosomal Telomeres in Somatic Cell Cloning of Mammals.

Authors:  Marcin Samiec; Maria Skrzyszowska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.