Literature DB >> 17222701

Mitochondrial DNA and the mammalian oocyte.

Eric A Shoubridge1, Timothy Wai.   

Abstract

In mammals, mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are transmitted through the female germ line. Mature oocytes contain at least 100,000 copies of mtDNA, organized at 1-2 copies per organelle. Despite the high genome copy number, mtDNA sequence variants are observed to segregate rapidly between generations, and this has led to the concept of a developmental bottleneck for the transmission of mtDNA. Ultrastructural investigations of primordial germ cells show that they contain approximately 10 mitochondria, suggesting that mitochondrial biogenesis is arrested during early embryogenesis, and that the mitochondria contributing to the germ cell precursors are simply apportioned from those present in the zygote. Thus, as few as 0.01% of the mitochondria in the oocyte actually contribute to the offspring of the next generation. Mitochondrial replication restarts in the migrating primordial germ cells, and mitochondrial numbers steadily increase to a few thousand in primordial oocytes. Genetic evidence from both heteroplasmic mice and human pedigrees suggests that segregation of mtDNA sequence variants is largely a stochastic process that occurs during the mitotic divisions of the germ cell precursors. This process is essentially complete by the time the primary oocyte population is differentiated in fetal life. Analysis of the distribution of pathogenic mtDNA mutations in the offspring of carrier mothers shows that risk of inheriting a pathogenic mutation increases with the proportion in the mother, but there is no bias toward transmitting more or less of the mutant mtDNAs. This implies that there is no strong selection against oocytes carrying pathogenic mutations and that atresia is not a filter for oocyte quality based on oxidative phosphorylation capacity. The large number of mitochondria and mtDNAs present in the oocyte may simply represent a genetic mechanism to ensure their distribution to the gametes and somatic cells of the next generation. If true, mtDNA copy number, and by inference mitochondrial number, may be the most important determinant of oocyte quality, not because of the effects on oocyte metabolism, but because too few would result in a maldistribution in the early embryo. 2007, Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17222701     DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)77004-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  55 in total

Review 1.  DNA ligase III: a spotty presence in eukaryotes, but an essential function where tested.

Authors:  Deniz Simsek; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in diabetes and normal adults: role of acquired and inherited mutational patterns in twins.

Authors:  Gal Avital; Mor Buchshtav; Ilia Zhidkov; Jeanette Tuval Feder; Sarah Dadon; Eitan Rubin; Dan Glass; Timothy D Spector; Dan Mishmar
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  No mitochondrial DNA deletions but more D-loop point mutations in repeated pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Seyedhassani; Massoud Houshmand; Seyed Mehdi Kalantar; Glayol Modabber; Abbas Aflatoonian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Mouse Polar Bodies, Oocytes, and Embryos.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 5.  The relationship between pluripotency and mitochondrial DNA proliferation during early embryo development and embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  J M Facucho-Oliveira; J C St John
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Analysis of mitochondrial length heteroplasmy in monozygous and non-monozygous siblings.

Authors:  S Lutz-Bonengel; U Schmidt; T Sänger; M Heinrich; P M Schneider; S Pollak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Modifying the Mitochondrial Genome.

Authors:  Alexander N Patananan; Ting-Hsiang Wu; Pei-Yu Chiou; Michael A Teitell
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from diabetic patients with mitochondrial DNA A3243G mutation.

Authors:  J Fujikura; K Nakao; M Sone; M Noguchi; E Mori; M Naito; D Taura; M Harada-Shiba; I Kishimoto; A Watanabe; I Asaka; K Hosoda; K Nakao
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Selective elimination of mitochondrial mutations in the germline by genome editing.

Authors:  Pradeep Reddy; Alejandro Ocampo; Keiichiro Suzuki; Jinping Luo; Sandra R Bacman; Sion L Williams; Atsushi Sugawara; Daiji Okamura; Yuji Tsunekawa; Jun Wu; David Lam; Xiong Xiong; Nuria Montserrat; Concepcion Rodriguez Esteban; Guang-Hui Liu; Ignacio Sancho-Martinez; Dolors Manau; Salva Civico; Francesc Cardellach; Maria Del Mar O'Callaghan; Jaime Campistol; Huimin Zhao; Josep M Campistol; Carlos T Moraes; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Testing the adaptive selection of human mtDNA haplogroups: an experimental bioenergetics approach.

Authors:  Joanna L Elson; Douglass M Turnbull; Robert W Taylor
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.