Literature DB >> 17222077

Rationale and public health implications of changing CHD risk factor definitions.

Robert M Kaplan1, Michael Ong.   

Abstract

The definition of disease is central to the practice of medicine and to public health policy. Practice guidelines set standards for disease identification and treatment. Quality care is often defined as adherence to these guidelines. Over the past few years, the diagnostic thresholds for several common medical conditions have been lowered, resulting in a substantial expansion in the market for health care. The most recent guidelines for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose each define a high percentage of the adult population as in need of regular medical attention. Under the latest proposed thresholds, virtually the entire adult population qualifies for a chronic condition diagnosis. We evaluate the health and financial outcomes associated with changes in diagnostic thresholds for the prevention of three risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke: blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose. Estimates of the numbers of people affected, the cost implications, and the overall public health consequences are offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17222077     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  12 in total

1.  National Institutes of Health science agenda: a public health perspective.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edwin B Fisher; Debra Haire-Joshu; Michael G Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Waste in the U.S. Health care system: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Tanya G K Bentley; Rachel M Effros; Kartika Palar; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services.

Authors:  Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Bonnie Sibbald; Chris Salisbury; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Public health significance of neuroticism.

Authors:  Benjamin B Lahey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  Clinical disorders in a post war British cohort reaching retirement: evidence from the First National Birth Cohort study.

Authors:  Mary B Pierce; Richard J Silverwood; Dorothea Nitsch; Judith E Adams; Alison M Stephen; Wing Nip; Peter Macfarlane; Andrew Wong; Marcus Richards; Rebecca Hardy; Diana Kuh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Balancing influence between actors in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Yair M Babad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Cholesterol and prevention of atherosclerotic events: limits of a new frontier.

Authors:  Luís Eduardo Teixeira de Macedo; Faerstein E
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.106

8.  Much more medicine for the oldest old: trends in UK electronic clinical records.

Authors:  David Melzer; Behrooz Tavakoly; Rachel E Winder; Jane A H Masoli; William E Henley; Alessandro Ble; Suzanne H Richards
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Bulliard; Arnaud Chiolero
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 10.  Screening and treatment of hypertension in older adults: less is more?

Authors:  Daniela Anker; Brigitte Santos-Eggimann; Valérie Santschi; Cinzia Del Giovane; Christina Wolfson; Sven Streit; Nicolas Rodondi; Arnaud Chiolero
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.