Literature DB >> 17221255

Investment in defense and cost of predator-induced defense along a resource gradient.

Ulrich K Steiner1.   

Abstract

An organism's investment in different traits to reduce predation is determined by the fitness benefit of the defense relative to the fitness costs associated with the allocation of time and resources to the defense. Inherent tradeoffs in time and resource allocation should result in differential investment in defense along a resource gradient, but competing models predict different patterns of investment. There are currently insufficient empirical data on changes in investment in defensive traits or their costs along resource gradients to differentiate between the competing allocation models. In this study, I exposed tadpoles to caged predators along a resource gradient in order to estimate investment in defense and costs of defense by assessing predator-induced plasticity. Induced defenses included increased tail depth, reduced feeding, and reduced swimming activity; costs associated with these defenses were reduced developmental rate, reduced growth, and reduced survival. At low resource availability, these costs predominately resulted in reduced survival, while at high resource availability the costs yielded a reduced developmental rate. Defensive traits responded strongly to predation risk, but did not respond to resource availability (with the exception of feeding activity), whereas traits construed as costs of defenses showed the opposite pattern. Therefore, defensive traits were highly sensitive to predation risk, while traits construed as costs of defense were highly sensitive to resource allocation tradeoffs. This difference in sensitivity between the two groups of traits may explain why the correlation between the expression of defensive traits and the expression of the associated defense costs was weak. Furthermore, my results indicate that genetic linkages and mechanistic integration of multiple defensive traits and their associated costs may constrain time and resource allocation in ways that are not addressed in existing models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221255     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0645-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  17 in total

Review 1.  The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses.

Authors:  C D Harvell
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  A lifetime perspective on foraging and mortality.

Authors:  Jonathan Yearsley; Ian M Hastings; Iain J Gordon; Ilias Kyriazakis; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Costs and limits of dosage response to predation risk: to what extent can tadpoles invest in anti-predator morphology?

Authors:  Céline Teplitsky; Sandrine Plénet; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Optimizing time and resource allocation trade-offs for investment into morphological and behavioral defense.

Authors:  Ulrich K Steiner; Thomas Pfeiffer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae.

Authors:  Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Jeffrey K Conner; Marc T J Johnson; Roger Wallsgrove
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history.

Authors:  Jason T Hoverman; Josh R Auld; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A PREDATOR-INDUCED POLYPHENISM IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS.

Authors:  S Andy McCollum; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  The growth/predation risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism?

Authors:  Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  15 in total

1.  Nonadditive impacts of temperature and basal resource availability on predator-prey interactions and phenotypes.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; Osamu Kishida
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Warmer temperatures reduce the costs of inducible defences in the marine toad, Rhinella marinus.

Authors:  Vincent O van Uitregt; Lesley A Alton; Jaime Heiniger; R S Wilson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Predator-prey chemical warfare determines the expression of biocontrol genes by rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Alexandre Jousset; Laurène Rochat; Stefan Scheu; Michael Bonkowski; Christoph Keel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Do anuran larvae respond behaviourally to chemical cues from an invasive crayfish predator? A community-wide study.

Authors:  Ana L Nunes; Alex Richter-Boix; Anssi Laurila; Rui Rebelo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  How do developmental and parental exposures to predation affect personality and immediate behavioural plasticity in the snail Physa acuta?

Authors:  Juliette Tariel; Sandrine Plénet; Emilien Luquet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Costs of inducible defence along a resource gradient.

Authors:  Christer Brönmark; Thomas Lakowitz; P Anders Nilsson; Johan Ahlgren; Charlotte Lennartsdotter; Johan Hollander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Allocation Costs Associated with Induced Defense in Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae): the Effects of Nutrient Availability.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Yan Wang; Linjian Ou; Xuejia He; Da Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Predator-induced changes in metabolism cannot explain the growth/predation risk tradeoff.

Authors:  Ulrich K Steiner; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Investment into defensive traits by anuran prey (Lithobates pipiens) is mediated by the starvation-predation risk trade-off.

Authors:  Amanda M Bennett; David Pereira; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Costs and trade-offs of grazer-induced defenses in Scenedesmus under deficient resource.

Authors:  Xuexia Zhu; Jun Wang; Qinwen Chen; Ge Chen; Yuan Huang; Zhou Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.