Literature DB >> 17220343

Genetic admixture among Hispanics and candidate gene polymorphisms: potential for confounding in a breast cancer study?

Carol Sweeney1, Roger K Wolff, Tim Byers, Kathy B Baumgartner, Anna R Giuliano, Jennifer S Herrick, Maureen A Murtaugh, Wade S Samowitz, Martha L Slattery.   

Abstract

Hispanics in the U.S. Southwest have genetic ancestry from Europeans and from American Indians, two groups with markedly different breast cancer incidence rates. Genetic admixture may therefore bias estimates of associations between candidate cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer in Hispanics. We estimated genetic admixture using 15 ancestry-informative markers for 1,239 Hispanics and 2,505 non-Hispanic Whites in a breast cancer case-control study in the Southwest, the Four Corners Study. Confounding risk ratios (CRR) were calculated to quantify potential bias due to admixture. Genetic admixture was strongly related to self-reported race and ethnic background (P < 0.0001). Among Hispanic controls, admixture was significantly associated with allele frequency for 5 of 11 candidate gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) examined. Hispanics in the highest versus the lowest quintile of American Indian admixture had higher mean body mass index at age 30 years (25.4 versus 23.6 kg/m(2); P = 0.003), shorter mean height (1.56 versus 1.58 m; P = 0.01), higher prevalence of diabetes (14.8% versus 7.2%; P = 0.04), and a larger proportion with less than a high school education (38.5% versus 23.2%; P = 0.001). Admixture was not associated with breast cancer risk among Hispanics (P = 0.65). CRRs for potential bias to candidate SNP-breast cancer risk ratios ranged from 0.99 to 1.01. Thus, although genetic admixture in Hispanics was associated with exposures, confounding by admixture was negligible due to the null association between admixture and breast cancer. CRRs from simulated scenarios indicated that appreciable confounding by admixture would occur only when within-group candidate SNP allele frequency differences are much larger than any that we observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17220343     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of statistical methods for estimating genetic admixture in a lung cancer study of African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Steve Selvin; Helen M Hansen; Lisa F Barcellos; Margaret R Wrensch; Jennette D Sison; Charles P Quesenberry; Rick A Kittles; Gabriel Silva; Patricia A Buffler; Michael F Seldin; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Progesterone receptor polymorphisms and clinical response to 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

Authors:  Tracy A Manuck; Yinglei Lai; Paul J Meis; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Celeste P Durnwald; Steve N Caritis; Ronald J Wapner; Brian M Mercer; Susan M Ramin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  MAOA, DBH, and SLC6A4 variants in CHARGE: a case-control study of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Flora Tassone; Lihong Qi; Wenting Zhang; Robin L Hansen; Isaac N Pessah; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.216

4.  Replication of five GWAS-identified loci and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women living in the Southwestern United States.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna R Giuliano; Tim Byers; Jennifer S Herrick; Roger K Wolff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Modifying effects of IL-6 polymorphisms on body size-associated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Karen Curtin; Carol Sweeney; Roger K Wolff; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna R Giuliano; Tim Byers
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 6.  Disruptions in energy balance: does nature overcome nurture?

Authors:  José R Fernández; Krista Casazza; Jasmin Divers; Mardya López-Alarcón
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-11-22

7.  Population-based case-control study of diabetes and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women living in US southwestern states.

Authors:  Dana E Rollison; Anna R Giuliano; Thomas A Sellers; Christine Laronga; Carol Sweeney; Betsy Risendal; Kathy B Baumgartner; Tim Byers; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  ADRB2 G-G haplotype associated with breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women: interaction with type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Authors:  Avonne Connor; Richard N Baumgartner; Richard A Kerber; Elizabeth O'Brien; Shesh N Rai; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery; Anna R Giuliano; Betsy C Risendal; Tim E Byers; Kathy B Baumgartner
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Genetic variation in genes involved in hormones, inflammation and energetic factors and breast cancer risk in an admixed population.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Esther M John; Gabriela Torres-Mejia; Abbie Lundgreen; Jennifer S Herrick; Kathy B Baumgartner; Lisa M Hines; Mariana C Stern; Roger K Wolff
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Reproductive history in relation to breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Kathy B Baumgartner; Tim Byers; Anna R Giuliano; Jennifer S Herrick; Maureen A Murtaugh; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.