Literature DB >> 17219349

Evaluation of the PRISMA M10 circuit in critically ill infants with acute kidney injury: A report from the Prospective Pediatric CRRT Registry Group.

S L Goldstein1, R Hackbarth, T E Bunchman, D Blowey, P D Brophy.   

Abstract

Currently available extracorporeal circuits in the US often require blood priming to prevent hypotension/anemia in smaller pediatric patients. The PRISMA M10 circuit, available in other countries has not received extensive study and has not been cleared for use in the US. We performed an FDA mandated study of the M10 circuit in the US for use in critically ill pediatric patients with acute kidney injury <15 kg in size. FDA guidelines allowed for maximal blood pump flow of 20 ml/min. Fifteen pts (9 M, 6 F, mean size 5.8+/-2.8 kg, range 2.6-12.5 kg, age 4 d - 13 mo, mean creatinine =1.2+/-0.7 mg/dL) were studied at 4 ppCRRT centers. Sixty-one filters (range 1-4 circuits per pt) were used (mean circuit life 28.6+/-22.5 h, range 1 to 74.5 h, 55%>24 h). No blood leaks occurred. All circuits achieved Qb 20 ml/min. Forty-two out of 61 filters clotted and mean circuit life was lower for these filters than those changed for other reasons (23+/-17 vs. 41+/-28 h, <0.005). Circuits using larger access demonstrated significantly longer survival. We conclude that the M10 filter can serve well for CRRT in small pediatric patients. Further study is needed to determine in higher blood flow rates would decrease clotting rates and increase filter life span and ultrafiltration rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17219349     DOI: 10.1177/039139880602901202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  7 in total

Review 1.  The prospective pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy (ppCRRT) registry: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Scott M Sutherland; Stuart L Goldstein; Steven R Alexander
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Kidney Support in Children using an Ultrafiltration Device: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shina Menon; John Broderick; Raj Munshi; Lynn Dill; Bradley DePaoli; Sahar Fathallah-Shaykh; Donna Claes; Stuart L Goldstein; David J Askenazi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Pediatric continuous renal replacement: 20 years later.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; Zaccaria Ricci
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Continuous renal replacement therapy in neonates weighing less than 3 kg.

Authors:  Young Bae Sohn; Kyung Hoon Paik; Hee Yeon Cho; Su Jin Kim; Sung Won Park; Eun Sun Kim; Yun Sil Chang; Won-Soon Park; Yoon-Ho Choi; Dong-Kyu Jin
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-23

Review 5.  Dialysis and pediatric acute kidney injury: choice of renal support modality.

Authors:  Scott Walters; Craig Porter; Patrick D Brophy
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Circuit lifespan during continuous renal replacement therapy: children and adults are not equal.

Authors:  Zaccaria Ricci; Isabella Guzzo; Stefano Picca; Sergio Picardo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy: have practice changes changed outcomes? A large single-center ten-year retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Alyssa A Riley; Mary Watson; Carolyn Smith; Danielle Guffey; Charles G Minard; Helen Currier; Ayse Akcan Arikan
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.388

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.