Literature DB >> 17219049

A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.

Lucien E M Duijm1, Johanna H Groenewoud, Rudi M H Roumen, Harry J de Koning, Menno L Plaisier, Jacques Fracheboud.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a prospective, multi-institutional follow-up study we describe the trends in the preoperative pathologic confirmation of breast cancer of women who underwent breast cancer screening between 1995 and 2005.
METHODS: We included all women aged 50-75 years who underwent biennial screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands between February 13, 1995 and December 22, 2004. Clinical data, breast imaging reports, biopsy results and breast surgery reports were collected of all women with a positive screening result. Follow-up lasted through the next biennial screening examination and was approximately two years for all referred women.
RESULTS: Of 258,900 mammographic screening examinations, 3,064 (1.2%) were positive screens. The majority of women (92%) were analyzed in four regional hospitals and workup yielded breast cancer in 1,332 women. From 1995 to 2005, the percentage of breast cancer cases that underwent percutaneous biopsy prior to surgery, increased from 42.4 to 100%. The proportion of cancers with a preoperative diagnosis of malignancy by percutaneous biopsy, increased from 27.1% in 1995 to 92.7% in 2004. Preoperative breast cancer confirmation by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) gradually decreased from 91.3% to 14.5%, whereas preoperative confirmation by ultrasound guided core biopsy (USCB) or stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) increased from 8.7% to 69.1% and from 0 to 17.4% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer is currently obtained in more than 90% of breast cancer patients. The increase in preoperative breast cancer diagnosis through 1995-2004 is correlated with the introduction of SNCB and increased use of USCB at the expense of FNAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219049     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9468-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

1.  Non-operative diagnosis--effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme.

Authors:  M G Wallis; S Cheung; O Kearins; G M Lawrence
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study.

Authors:  E G Klompenhouwer; L E M Duijm; A C Voogd; G J den Heeten; J Nederend; F H Jansen; M J M Broeders
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography.

Authors:  Wikke Setz-Pels; Lucien E M Duijm; Marieke W J Louwman; Rudi M H Roumen; Frits H Jansen; Adri C Voogd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000-2005.

Authors:  Lucien E M Duijm; Johanna H Groenewoud; Jacques Fracheboud; Menno L Plaisier; Rudi M H Roumen; B Martin van Ineveld; Mike van Beek; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Triple negativity and young age as prognostic factors in lymph node-negative invasive ductal carcinoma of 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Kwon; Yu Jung Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Do-Youn Oh; So Yeon Park; Jee Hyun Kim; Eui Kyu Chie; Sung-Won Kim; Seock-Ah Im; In-Ah Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Yung-Jue Bang; Sung Whan Ha
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Core needle biopsy of breast cancer tumors increases distant metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Edward Gitau Mathenge; Cheryl Ann Dean; Derek Clements; Ahmad Vaghar-Kashani; Steffany Photopoulos; Krysta Mila Coyle; Michael Giacomantonio; Benjamin Malueth; Anna Nunokawa; Julie Jordan; John D Lewis; Shashi Ashok Gujar; Paola Marcato; Patrick W K Lee; Carman Anthony Giacomantonio
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P Arul; Suresh Masilamani
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

8.  Trends in breast biopsies for abnormalities detected at screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  V van Breest Smallenburg; J Nederend; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; M van Beek; F H Jansen; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Fine-needle aspiration cytology can play a role in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Christian Garbar; Hervé Curé
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-07-10

10.  Does fine-needle aspiration biopsy still have a place in the diagnosis of breast lesions?

Authors:  Marzanna Obrzut; Marian Cholewa; Jakub Baran; Agnieszka Obrzut-Palusińska; Ewa Kurczab
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2018-04-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.