Literature DB >> 17219033

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in dermatomyositis- and polymyositis.

Marc-André Weber1, Uta Jappe, Marco Essig, Martin Krix, Carina Ittrich, Hagen B Huttner, B Hagen Huttner, Uta Meyding-Lamadé, Marius Hartmann, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Stefan Delorme.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients suspected of having dermatomyositis or polymyositis.
METHODS: In 35 patients (23 women, 12 men; mean age, 51 years+/-16 years) who were suspected of having dermatomyositis or polymyositis, perfusion in clinically affected skeletal muscles was quantified with contrast-enhanced intermittent power Doppler ultrasound. By applying a modified model that analyzed the replenishment kinetics of microbubbles, the perfusion-related parameters blood flow, local blood volume and blood flow velocity were measured. Findings were compared with muscle biopsy appearances and with the results of MRI that was performed with a 1.5-Tesla unit. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed and optimum thresholds for diagnosis of myositis were determined.
RESULTS: Eleven patients had histologically confirmed dermatomyositis or polymyositis and showed significantly higher blood flow velocity (P=.01 for dermato- and P<.001 for polymyositis), blood flow (P<.001 for dermato- and polymyositis), and blood volume (P=.007 for dermato- and P<.001 for polymyositis) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound than those who did not have myositis. An increase in signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images was found in all patients with myositis. MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predicting values (NPV) of 100%, 88%, 77%, and 100% for diagnosis of myositis, respectively. CEUS blood flow was the best ultrasound measure for diagnosis of dermato- or polymyositis with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 73%, 91%, 80%, and 88%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased skeletal muscle perfusion measured by CEUS could serve as an additional measurer for the diagnosis of an inflammatory myopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17219033     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0318-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  21 in total

1.  STIR magnetic resonance imaging: a noninvasive method for detection and follow-up of dermatomyositis.

Authors:  G Yosipovitch; O Beniaminov; I Rousso; M David
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1999-06

2.  Minimally selected p and other tests for a single abrupt changepoint in a binary sequence.

Authors:  A L Halpern
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for distinguishing between inclusion body myositis and polymyositis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dion; Patrick Cherin; Christine Payan; Jean-Charles Fournet; Thomas Papo; Thierry Maisonobe; Eric Auberton; Olivier Chosidow; Pierre Godeau; Jean-Charles Piette; Serge Herson; Philippe Grenier
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Martin Krix; Marc-André Weber; Holger Krakowski-Roosen; Hagen B Huttner; Stefan Delorme; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Wulf Hildebrandt
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Pathologic skeletal muscle perfusion in patients with myositis: detection with quantitative contrast-enhanced US--initial results.

Authors:  Marc-André Weber; Martin Krix; Uta Jappe; Hagen B Huttner; Marius Hartmann; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Marco Essig; Christoph Fiehn; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Muscle imaging in inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  C D Reimers; M Finkenstaedt
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Use of imaging to assess patients with muscle disease.

Authors:  David L Scott; Gabrielle H Kingsley
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 9.  Polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Marinos C Dalakas; Reinhard Hohlfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Possible pathogenic mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Ingrid E Lundberg; Maryam Dastmalchi
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound in the evaluation of the inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Ronald S Adler; Giovanna Garofalo
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  The use of Doppler ultrasound to evaluate lesions of localized scleroderma.

Authors:  Suzanne C Li; Melissa S Liebling
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of skeletal muscle].

Authors:  M-A Weber; S Wormsbecher; M Krix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Clinical Muscle Testing Compared with Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Facio-scapulo-humeral Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  J U Regula; L Jestaedt; F Jende; A Bartsch; H-M Meinck; M-A Weber
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Clinicopathological features of sarcoidosis manifesting as generalized chronic myopathy.

Authors:  Shinya Maeshima; Haruki Koike; Seiya Noda; Tomoko Noda; Hirotaka Nakanishi; Masahiro Iijima; Mizuki Ito; Seigo Kimura; Gen Sobue
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Role of bone scan in the assessment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Young-Sil An; Chang-Hee Suh; Ju-Yang Jung; Hyoun-Ah Kim
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Skeletal muscle microvascular flow in progressive peripheral artery disease: assessment with continuous arterial spin-labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Wen-Chau Wu; Emile Mohler; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Felix W Wehrli; John A Detre; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Inflammatory muscle disease: clinical presentation and assessment of patients.

Authors:  Helene Alexanderson; Ingrid E Lundberg
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  [CEUS-application possibilities in the musculoskeletal system].

Authors:  M Jäschke; M-A Weber; C Fischer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Quantitative evaluation of muscle perfusion with CEUS and with MR.

Authors:  Marc-André Weber; Martin Krix; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.