Literature DB >> 17219013

Quality of race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status in population-based cancer registry data: implications for health disparity studies.

Limin X Clegg1, Marsha E Reichman, Benjamin F Hankey, Barry A Miller, Yi D Lin, Norman J Johnson, Stephen M Schwartz, Leslie Bernstein, Vivien W Chen, Marc T Goodman, Scarlett L Gomez, John J Graff, Charles F Lynch, Charles C Lin, Brenda K Edwards.   

Abstract

Population-based cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program at the National Cancer Institute are based on medical records and administrative information. Although SEER data have been used extensively in health disparities research, the quality of information concerning race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status has not been systematically evaluated. The quality of this information was determined by comparing SEER data with self-reported data among 13,538 cancer patients diagnosed between 1973-2001 in the SEER--National Longitudinal Mortality Study linked database. The overall agreement was excellent on race (kappa = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88-0.91), moderate to substantial on Hispanic ethnicity (kappa = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.58-0.64), and low on immigrant status (kappa = 0.21. 95% CI = 0.10, 0.23). The effect of these disagreements was that SEER data tended to under-classify patient numbers when compared to self-identifications, except for the non-Hispanic group which was slightly over-classified. These disagreements translated into varying racial-, ethnic-, and immigrant status-specific cancer statistics, depending on whether self-reported or SEER data were used. In particular, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival and the median survival time from all causes for American Indians/Alaska Natives were substantially higher when based on self-classification (59% and 140 months, respectively) than when based on SEER classification (44% and 53 months, respectively), although the number of patients is small. These results can serve as a useful guide to researchers contemplating the use of population-based registry data to ascertain disparities in cancer burden. In particular, the study results caution against evaluating health disparities by using birthplace as a measure of immigrant status and race information for American Indians/Alaska Natives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219013     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0089-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  90 in total

1.  Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy use among veterans with colon cancer: insights from a California study.

Authors:  Denise M Hynes; Elizabeth Tarlov; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Ruth Perrin; Qiuying Zhang; Thomas Weichle; M Rosario Ferreira; Todd Lee; Al B Benson; Nirmala Bhoopalam; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Short-Term Incidence of Sequelae of HCV Infection Among Medicaid Beneficiaries in Oregon.

Authors:  Kazuaki Jindai; Courtney Crawford; Ann R Thomas
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Childhood leukemia incidence in California: High and rising in the Hispanic population.

Authors:  Brenda M Giddings; Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Higher Lung Cancer Incidence in Young Women Than Young Men in the United States.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Kimberly D Miller; Jiemin Ma; Rebecca L Siegel; Stacey A Fedewa; Farhad Islami; Susan S Devesa; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations.

Authors:  Scarlett Lin Gomez; Sally L Glaser; Laura A McClure; Sarah J Shema; Melissa Kealey; Theresa H M Keegan; William A Satariano
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979-2003.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Sean Altekruse
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Racial misclassification of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Indian Health Service Contract Health Service Delivery Area.

Authors:  Melissa A Jim; Elizabeth Arias; Dean S Seneca; Megan J Hoopes; Cheyenne C Jim; Norman J Johnson; Charles L Wiggins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Uncovering nativity disparities in cancer patterns: Multiple imputation strategy to handle missing nativity data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data file.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Renke Zhou; E Susan Amirian; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Medical advances and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer survival.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Alfred I Neugut; Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link; Yuyan Liao; Manisha Desai; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Cancer incidence in the Middle Eastern population of California, 1988-2004.

Authors:  Kiumarss Nasseri; Paul K Mills; Mark Allan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.