Literature DB >> 17218235

Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon.

Yücel Karaman1, Banu Bingol, Ziya Günenç.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe a safe technique without any ureteral, bladder, and major vessel injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy with a CO2 laser technique.
DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Centre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endoscopic Laser Surgery Center, Bruxelles, Belgium; and Kadir Has University, Metropolitan Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. PATIENTS: One thousand one hundred twenty women with benign diseases.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) or laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2004, in 1120 women with benign diseases, consecutive LAVH or LH was planned. During laparoscopic hysterectomy, at all stages, bipolar forceps was used for hemostasis, and a CO2 laser was used for vaporization and excision. The total operating time was 35 to 180 minutes, with a median of 52 minutes (range 35-163) for LAVH (n = 542) and 55 minutes (range 42-180) for LH (n = 552). Operations were successfully completed laparoscopically in 98.8% of the patients. The mean hospital stay was 2 days. The overall major complication rate was 1%. No ureteral, bladder, or major vascular injury occurred.
CONCLUSION: The technique we used in our study is safe and effective in the prevention of ureteral, vesical, and vascular injuries during LAVH and LH; moreover, the use of bipolar coagulation and a CO2 laser in endoscopic surgery results in a shorter duration of operation. This technique provides all the advantages of both laparoscopic and vaginal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  8 in total

1.  Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.

Authors:  Thomas N Payne; Francis R Dauterive
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

2.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Brent C Opmeer; Peggy M Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Gérard L Bremer; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 4.  Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Rajeswara R Resapu; Daniel B Jones; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Hysterectomies: Our 10 Years Experience in a Single Laparoscopic Center.

Authors:  Ramesh Bettaiah; Chandana Anantha Rama Reddy
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jin Woo Shin; Ho Hyung Lee; Soon Pyo Lee; Chan Yong Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Secondary hemorrhage after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  P G Paul; Talwar Prathap; Harneet Kaur; Khan Shabnam; Dimple Kandhari; Gaurav Chopade
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Realhand high dexterity instruments for the treatment of stage I uterine malignancy.

Authors:  Mark A Rettenmaier; Katrina Lopez; Cheri L Graham; John V Brown; Cameron R John; John P Micha; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.