Literature DB >> 1721814

[Prospective randomized study on the comparative effect between 10% HES 200/0.5 and 6% HES 200/0.5 in patients with hearing loss].

G Friedrich1, E Ott.   

Abstract

Two good comparable groups of patients (group 1 treated with 10% HES 200/0.5 + Naftidrofuryl; and group 2 treated with 6% HES 200/0.5 + Naftidrofuryl) with sudden hearing loss were compared with respect to their hearing recovery, hemorheological parameters and intravasal detectable HES fraction. The results showed an overall improvement of the hemorheological features. No difference between the two groups could be found wether in the hearing improvement nor the investigated parameters. We therefore conclude, that HES 6% is a good alternative to HES 10% for hemodilution therapy in cochleo-vestibular disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1721814     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-998121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  4 in total

1.  Therapy of hearing disorders - conservative procedures.

Authors:  Stefan Plontke
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

Review 2.  Vasodilators and vasoactive substances for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Lekha Agarwal; David D Pothier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

3.  [A software tool for pure-tone audiometry: Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. German version].

Authors:  T Rahne; F Buthut; S Plößl; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  A software tool for pure‑tone audiometry. Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. English version.

Authors:  T Rahne; F Buthut; S Plößl; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.