Literature DB >> 17218102

Guideline implementation fails to improve thrombolytic administration.

Leigh Kinsman1, Kathleen Tori, Ruth Endacott, Matthew Sharp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International randomised controlled trials conducted over the last two decades have consistently demonstrated improved mortality and morbidity resulting from thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Subsequently, evidence-based guidelines have been designed and implemented to optimize thrombolytic delivery. The effect of evidence-based clinical guidelines on clinical practice is heavily influenced by strategies used to develop, disseminate and implement those guidelines. AIMS: This study evaluated the impact of a collaborative, multifaceted implementation strategy for AMI management guidelines on thrombolytic usage in the Loddon Mallee Region, Victoria, Australia. INTERVENTION: The multi-faceted implementation strategy included an inter-disciplinary team representing all treating venues contributing to the content of the "Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction" followed by education sessions that coincided with the dissemination of the guidelines.
METHODS: A retrospective medical records audit 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after the intervention was used to evaluate the impact on proportion of those patients eligible and receiving a thrombolytic and door-to-needle time. Variables of treating venue, age, gender, type of AMI, and type of transport to hospital were also measured to determine their impact on results. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: A retrospective audit of 170 medical records found that the intervention appeared to have had no impact on the proportion of patients eligible and receiving a thrombolytic (74.2% vs. 62.5%: p=0.275), and door-to-needle time (67.7 min vs. 60.5 min: p=0.759). Venue specific influences produced a variety of patterns in thrombolytic delivery that require further exploration. This suggests that a single solution approach across multiple venues will have limited impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218102     DOI: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0965-2302


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of interventions and system changes to improve time to reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kelly A McDermott; Christian D Helfrich; Anne E Sales; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Fundus Photography vs. Ophthalmoscopy Outcomes in the Emergency Department (FOTO-ED) Phase III: Web-based, In-service Training of Emergency Providers.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce; Samuel Bidot; Rabih Hage; Lindsay C Clough; Caroline Fajoles-Vasseneix; Mikhail Melomed; Matthew T Keadey; David W Wright; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-01-26

3.  A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments.

Authors:  Leigh D Kinsman; Penny Buykx; John S Humphreys; Pamela C Snow; Jon Willis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Failure to improve door-to-needle time by switching to emergency physician-initiated thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alexander Loch; Tint Lwin; Idzwan Mohd Zakaria; Imran Zainal Abidin; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  The effect of a Computerised Decision Support System (CDSS) on compliance with the prehospital assessment process: results of an interrupted time-series study.

Authors:  Magnus Andersson Hagiwara; Björn-Ove Suserud; Boel Andersson-Gäre; Bengt- Arne Sjöqvist; Maria Henricson; Anders Jonsson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.