Literature DB >> 17216817

Differential expression of prognostic factors and effect on survival in young (< or =40) breast cancer patients: a case-control study.

Michael C Hartley1, Brian P McKinley, Emily A Rogers, Corey A Kalbaugh, H S Messich, Dawn W Blackhurst, Jonathan S Lokey, Steven D Trocha.   

Abstract

The belief that young women develop more aggressive forms of breast cancer than other women is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine if women 40 years of age and under with breast cancer have more negative prognostic indicators and a higher 5-year mortality than those women over 40 years of age. From January 1998-December 2002, all women with breast cancer were identified from our tumor registry. Women with metastatic disease at presentation were excluded from our study. The women were divided into two groups, women under 40 (cases) and women 40 and over (controls). Seventy-eight cases were identified and matched to 228 controls. These cohorts were matched 3:1 (cases:controls) based on tumor staging. The data collected on each patient included prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor type, estrogen and progesterone receptors, Her2/neu, and Ki-67. Information on surgical procedure, postoperative therapy, recurrence, and mortality was also gathered. The mean ages for cases and controls were 35 and 59 years, respectively. The rates of modified radical mastectomy were similar in the two groups, but young women were more likely to have breast reconstruction (33.7% vs 9.8%). The rates of breast conservation therapy were actually lower in the group under 40 (32.5% vs 37.6%). Tumors in the 40 and under group were more frequently estrogen receptor negative (33.8% vs 21.9%: P = 0.046) and progesterone receptor negative (50.0% vs 35.5%: P = 0.033). Younger women also experienced a greater prevalence of Ki-67 (P < 0.001) and higher levels of Her2/neu overexpression (P = 0.013). Women over 40 were more likely to receive hormonal therapy (39.7% vs 36.1%). Women over 40 had a lower overall rate of recurrence. A difference in overall survival does exist between these two groups of women, which trends toward significance. The women 40 and under had a lower overall 5-year survival. The reason for this difference remains unclear. Although we demonstrate a higher percentage of younger women with negative biochemical markers, the only factors independently and significantly related to higher mortality were estrogen receptor negativity and tumor stage at presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17216817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  19 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  S Samuel Kim; Jennifer Klemp; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Immunohistochemical detection of phospho-Akt, phospho-BAD, HER2 and oestrogen receptors alpha and beta in Malaysian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Heng Fong Seow; Wai Kien Yip; Hui Woon Loh; Hairuszah Ithnin; Patricia Por; Mohammad Rohaizak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Young women with locally advanced breast cancer who achieve breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a low local recurrence rate.

Authors:  Raeshell S Sweeting; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Michael O Meyers; Allison M Deal; Emily M Burrows; Amy A Drobish; Carey K Anders; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Breast cancer in women younger than 35 years old.

Authors:  Dimitrios Zouzoulas; Dimitrios Tsolakidis; Georgios Gitas; Menelaos Zafrakas; Dimitrios G Goulis; George Douganiotis; Georgios Sympilidis; Grigorios Grimbizis
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Breast cancer in young women in a limited-resource environment.

Authors:  Sarinah Basro; Justus P Apffelstaedt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Breast Cancer in Young Women: Health State Utility Impacts by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; Linda Chamiec-Case; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Tumour biomarker expression relative to age and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  D H Morrison; D Rahardja; E King; Y Peng; V R Sarode
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  DNA stabilization by the upregulation of estrogen signaling in BRCA gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Suba
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Tumor aromatase expression as a prognostic factor for local control in young breast cancer patients after breast-conserving treatment.

Authors:  Marc A Bollet; Alexia Savignoni; Leanne De Koning; Carine Tran-Perennou; Catherine Barbaroux; Armelle Degeorges; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Geneviève Almouzni; Paul Cottu; Rémy Salmon; Nicolas Servant; Alain Fourquet; Patricia de Cremoux
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Age-specific gene expression signatures for breast tumors and cross-species conserved potential cancer progression markers in young women.

Authors:  Dilek Colak; Asmaa Nofal; Albandary Albakheet; Maimoona Nirmal; Hatim Jeprel; Abdelmoneim Eldali; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Asma Tulbah; Dahish Ajarim; Osama Al Malik; Mehmet S Inan; Namik Kaya; Ben H Park; Suad M Bin Amer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.