Literature DB >> 17216329

Biodiversity of Fusarium species in Mexico associated with ear rot in maize, and their identification using a phylogenetic approach.

Irma Morales-Rodríguez1, María de J Yañez-Morales, Hilda V Silva-Rojas, Gabino García-de-Los-Santos, Doralinda A Guzmán-de-Peña.   

Abstract

Fusarium proliferatum, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides are known causes of ear and kernel rot in maize worldwide. In Mexico, only F. verticillioides and F. subglutinans, have been reported previously as causal agents of this disease. However, Fusarium isolates with different morphological characteristics to the species that are known to cause this disease were obtained in the Highland-Valley region of this country from symptomatic and symptomless ears of native and commercial maize genotypes. Moreover, while the morphological studies were not sufficient to identify the correct taxonomic position at the species level, analyses based in the Internal Transcribed Spacer region and the Nuclear Large Subunit Ribosomal partial sequences allowed for the identification of F. subglutinans, F. solani, and F. verticillioides, as well as four species (F. chlamydosporum, F. napiforme, F. poae, and F. pseudonygamai) that had not previously been reported to be associated with ear rot. In addition, F. napiforme and F. solani were absent from symptomless kernels. Phylogenetic analysis showed genetic changes in F. napiforme, and F. pseudonygamai isolates because they were not true clones, and probably constitute separate sibling species. The results of this study suggest that the biodiversity of Fusarium species involved in ear rot in Mexico is greater than that reported previously in other places in the world. This new knowledge will permit a better understanding of the relationship between all the species involved in ear rot disease and their relationship with maize.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17216329      PMCID: PMC2780687          DOI: 10.1007/s11046-006-0082-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycopathologia        ISSN: 0301-486X            Impact factor:   2.574


Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the four basic food staples of the world population [1] and at the same time is the crop that has the first place in production volume in the world. In developed countries most of the maize produced is used for animal feed and industrial uses other than human food [2]. In Mexico maize is the main human food source and per capita consumption is estimated to be 328 g day−1 [3]. The majority of the reported maize diseases, affecting roots, stalks, ears, and kernels, are caused by fungi [4]. Among these diseases, ear rot is one of the most important in all the countries where this cereal is grown. In addition to reduced crop yield, ear rot adverasely affects the physical, physiological, and phytosanitary qualities of the seed [5, 6]. The causal agents reported worldwide as responsible for ear rot are Fusarium proliferatum, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides [4]. These pathogens survive in the soil, in infected plant debris, and inside apparently healthy seed and can affect the embryo and pericarp without visible symptoms. Infection can be seedborne and systemic in the crop from seedling to harvest, or starting during the pollination where the silks are infected by the airborne conidia. During harvest, ear rot appears as individual rotted kernels or as randomly scattered groups of rotted kernels [4, 7]. In addition, depending on the specific fungus responsible for the ear rot, the production of mycotoxins can be an important source of contamination. The three Fusarium species involved in ear rot disease are included in the Gibberella fujikuroi complex [7, 8]. Morphological differences between the three species are an important step in the classification, however, currently there is no consensus definition among research groups that will allow definitive identification based on morphology alone. Revisions in recent years have asserted that the first criteria to define a Fusarium species [7], was the use of the biological species concept, but it has some limitations. Some researchers have adopted the concept of phylogenetic species which considers the use of one or more conserved genes or sequences to define a species of this genus [9], such as the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal genes 18S-5.8S-28S [10]. In Mexico, the species that have been found to cause ear rot are F. verticillioides [11] and F. subglutinans [12, 13], and since this disease is the most important in the Highland Valley, based on reduced yield and grain quality [8], the aim of this research was to determine the biodiversity of the Fusarium species associated with ear rot in this geographical area of the country utilizing both a morphological and phylogenetic approach.

Materials and methods

During the fall-winter of 2002, at the Colegio de Postgraduados’ plots, located in Montecillo-Highland-Valley (elevation 2250 m), in the central part of Mexico, 10 symptomatic and two symptomless ears from each one of 28 native maize genotypes were collected (Table 1).
Table 1

Relation of 28 native maize genotypes and their origin in the Highland of Mexicoa

GenotypesOrigin
ASV11Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV34Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV36Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV45Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV49Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV64Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV71Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV76Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV84Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV86Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV87Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV102Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV111Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
ASV112Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
Qro-21Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
(Chalqueño Qro)
Zac-66Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
(Chalqueño Dgo-Zac)
Hgo-88Sierra Purepecha, Michoacan
(Chalqueño Hgo)
Pedro CruzSierra Purepecha, Michoacan
(7a CSM)
(Chalco Crema)
Santos AltamiranoValle de Chalco, Edo. de
6a CSMMexico
(Chalco palomo)
Comp. FamiliasValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(Chalqueño Cajetes)Mexico
Manuel Montes de OcaValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(Ciclo 8)Mexico
David Rivera EnrriqueValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(1a CSM)Mexico
Pedro Cruz LinaresValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(8a CSM)Mexico
Ignácio RosasValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(7a CSM)Mexico
David Rivera ReyesValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(2a CSM)Mexico
Pedro HernandezValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(Ciclo 8)Mexico
Santos AltamiranoValle de Chalco, Edo. de
(7a CSM)Mexico
Oaxaca 492Oaxaca

aThe native maize genotypes are grown from 1900 to 2700 m elevation.

Relation of 28 native maize genotypes and their origin in the Highland of Mexicoa aThe native maize genotypes are grown from 1900 to 2700 m elevation.

Symptomatic and symptomless ear isolates

The ears of all the genotypes with visible rot symptoms were grouped according to the mycelium colour. Of each group, a fungal sample grown on the top of the kernels was taken to obtain monoconidial cultures. To isolate the fungi that were within the symptomless kernels, hundred of seeds were randomly chosen from the apparently healthy ears and mixed. The seeds were disinfested using a 3:1 solution of sodium hypochlorite 1.5 %, and ethanol 25% for 2 min. After that, they were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Internal fungi were obtained through the Blotter method [14]. The colonies that developed over the seed were examined microscopically. Fusarium colonies were selected according to the mycelium colour.

Monoconidial cultures

The mycelium of each group selected from symptomatic and symptomless kernels was placed into 10 ml test tubes with 5 ml of sterile distilled water, and shaken in a Mini Vortex (VWR, USA). The content of individual tubes was poured into Petri dishes with water-agar (WA) (18 g of agar/l) and allowed to stay on the plates for 10 s and then the excess was removed. The Petri dishes were maintained at room temperature (22–24°C) for 24 h. The germinated conidia were transferred to new Petri dishes containing Potato Carrot Agar medium (PCA) (20 g of potato, 20 g of carrot, and 15 g of agar/l) and kept at room temperature with constant white light for seven days. The conidia were transferred into sterile glycerol 25%, and stored in Eppendorf tubes at −84°C.

Morphological characterization

To identify the fungi at the genus level, the Manual of Barnett and Hunter [15] was used and the determination of the species was according to Booth [16], Nelson et al. [17], and Burgess et al. [18]. Also the descriptions of Marasas et al. [19], Pascoe [20], and Nirenberg and O’Donnell [21] were referred to when necessary.

Colour of the colony

The Fusarium cultures were placed into slant tubes containing Potato Dextrose Agar medium (PDA) (250 g of potato, 20 g of dextrose, and 20 g of agar/l) amended with a half-cup of potato pulp. To promote sporulation and colouring, the tubes were maintained at 20°C with continuous white light for 10 days [17]. Finally, the colour of the mycelia was evaluated on both sides, the tubes were grouped according to the colour, and only one isolate was selected from each group for further morphological and phylogenetic analysis.

Structure formation

To set up microcultures in humidity chambers, Petri dishes were used [22]. Aluminium foil, a microscope slide, and a PDA square of 5 mm3 were placed in the plate, in this order one over the other, and a portion of mycelia was taken and placed on each PDA square. A cover slide was placed over the inoculated PDA squares. The Petri dishes were sealed and maintained at±24°C under white (12 h) and black light (12 h) (365 nm-General Electric 40 W F40SL, Mexico) for seven days. After the mycelia colonized the cover slide it was removed with sterile forceps and permanently mounted on a microscope slide with a drop of acidified glycerol. The size, shape and other key characteristics of each structure were recorded and photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (Nikon COOLPIX 5000, Japan).

Obtaining of macroconidia and napiforme microconidia

The isolates were placed on Carnation-Leaf-Agar medium (CLA) (18 g of agar/l), and 10 carnation leaves were amended to the medium before the agar solidified [23], the leaves were irradiated previously with gamma rays at the Nuclear Centre of Mexico. The Petri dishes were kept at room temperature (22–24°C) with white light for 25 days, and then permanently mounted for microscopic evaluation.

Formation of microconidia into chains

To stimulate this structure isolates were grown in KCl medium (8 g of KCl, and 14 g of agar/l) amended with 10 carnation leaves. The Petri dishes were kept at room temperature (22—24°C) under black light for 10 days, and the aerial mycelium was microscopically examined.

Formation of chlamydospores

This conserved structure was induced in PDA medium, and the Petri dishes were kept at room temperature (22–24°C) with white light for 14 days.

Phylogenetic analysis

The DNA of 21 monosporic cultures was obtained with the protocol of Ahrens and Seemüller [24], and quality was verified by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel (Ultrapure, Gibco, USA) using TBE buffer (Tris-Borate-EDTA pH 8.0). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and the amplicons were visualized in a transilluminator (Gel Doc 2000, BIO RAD®, USA). The DNA concentration was quantified in a Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer (Lambda BIO 10, USA). To amplify the ITS region ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [10], primers were used, and to amplify a partial sequence of 28S rRNA gene, ITS5 and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) primers were used [10, 11].PCR master mix was prepared in a final volume of 25 µl containing 1× of Taq DNA buffer, 0.13 mM of MgCl2, 16 µMof dNTPs, 20 qmole of each primer, 0.4 U of Taq-DNA polymerase (University Biotecnologies ®, Mexico), and 80 ng of DNA. PCR was carried out in a Perkin-Elmer thermocycler (CT 2400 ICA, USA) with an initial denaturing at 95°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of denaturing at 95°Cfor 1 min, annealing at 50°Cfor 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 2 min; afterwards at 72°C for 10 min as single final extension cycle. The PCR product was purified using a QIAquick kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the instructions given by the manufacturer. The fragment amplified was verified on a 0.8% agarose gel, and the gel was stained as above. The remaining PCR-products were sequenced in both directions in an ABI PRISM 3700 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequences were edited with Lasergene 2001, V.5 Software (DNASTAR Inc., USA), and the most related sequence was obtained using GenBank-Blast (NCBI-National Centre for Biotechnology Information). DNA sequences were aligned with the profile mode of ClustalW, and an evolutionary distances matrix was generated with Kimura 2 parameter substitution model. The evolutionary tree for the datasets was constructed with the neighbour-joining algorithm and the confidence of the tree was assessed by bootstrap analysis based on 5000 boot strap replications using MEGA 3.1 software [25].

Results and discussion

Isolates obtained

Of the symptomatic and symptomless kernels, eight and 13 isolates were obtained, respectively, on the basis of colour in PDA slant tubes (Table 2).
Table 2

Morphological comparison of the structures of seven Fusarium species associated with ear rot of maize obtained from symptomatic and symptomless ears during fall to winter 2002 in Montecillo, Mexico

Morphological characteristicsGibberella fujikuroi complexF. poae*,**F. solani**
F. napiforme**F. pseudonygamai*,**F. subglutinans*,**F. verticillioides*,**F. chlamydosporum*,**
Microconidia (length × width in μm)9.8 × 5.0a, 10.2 × 2.4b, 19.25 × 3.9c11.1 × 2.42, 5.0−13.8 × 1.9−4.011.32 × 3.1, 8−12 × 2.5–311.8 × 2.4, 5.0−12.0 × 1.5−2.59.7 × 3.311.46 × 7.0, 8−12 × 7−10d9.5 × 3, 8−16 × 2−4
Microconidia in chains++ (short)+
False heads microconidia+++++
Mesoconidia1−3 septate0−3 septate.O
Shape and size (length × width in µm)17.0 × 4.511.0 × 4
Macroconidia (length × width in µm43.5 × 3.839.0 × 4.037.4 × 4.231.0 × 3.740.4 × 3.522.1 × 3.650.3 × 5.0
ConidiophoreBranchedSingle or branchedBranchedSingle or branchedBranchedBranchedBranched
Phialides (length × width in µmMonophialideMonophialideMonophialideMonophialideMonophialide PolyphialideMonophialideMonophialide
27.0 × 3.026.0 × 2.4323.5 × 2.722.0 × 3.526.7 × 2.714.0 × 6.045.0−73.0 × 2.4
PolyphialidePolyphialidePolyphialide
Chlamydospores+++
ColoureWhite/purpleWhite/orange, grayWhite purple/pink-purplePurple gray/pink-purplebrown/brownWhite pink/orangeLight cream/light cream
Isolates2, 4, 610B, 13A, 13B, 18, 199, 11, 145, 10A16, 1712, 15A, 15B3, 7, 8

*Isolates obtained from 100 symptomless kernels.

** isolates obtained from symptomatic kernels.

aNapiform conidia with 0–1 septate.

bOvoid conidia with 0–1 septate.

cOvoid conidia with 1–3 septate.

dAmpuliform conidia

eSlant tubes containing PDA with amended potato pulp.

Morphological comparison of the structures of seven Fusarium species associated with ear rot of maize obtained from symptomatic and symptomless ears during fall to winter 2002 in Montecillo, Mexico *Isolates obtained from 100 symptomless kernels. ** isolates obtained from symptomatic kernels. aNapiform conidia with 0–1 septate. bOvoid conidia with 0–1 septate. cOvoid conidia with 1–3 septate. dAmpuliform conidia eSlant tubes containing PDA with amended potato pulp. Typical Fusarium structures were observed in the 21 isolates selected. In general, we observed noncoloured septate mycelium, globular to fusiform microconidia with zero to three septate; falcate to cylindric macroconidia with seven septate according to the species; and the mesoconidia (the third type of Fusarium conidia) with zero to three septate [21], some species had brown coloured chlamydospores (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Morphological differential features of Fusarium species. (a) F. chlamydosporum: brown chlamydospores in chains and polyphialide, (b) F. napiforme: napiform microconidia (globose with a small protuberance), (c) F. poae: ampuliform microconidia with papilla, 0–1 septate and monophialide, (d). F. pseudonygamai: large microconidia aseptate, (e) F. solani: false heads microconidia, and large monophialide, (f) F. subglutinans: large mesoconidia, fusiform, straight 1–3 septate, and G. F. verticillioides: microconidia in large chains observed on Petri dish under the low power of the microscope 10tx.

Morphological differential features of Fusarium species. (a) F. chlamydosporum: brown chlamydospores in chains and polyphialide, (b) F. napiforme: napiform microconidia (globose with a small protuberance), (c) F. poae: ampuliform microconidia with papilla, 0–1 septate and monophialide, (d). F. pseudonygamai: large microconidia aseptate, (e) F. solani: false heads microconidia, and large monophialide, (f) F. subglutinans: large mesoconidia, fusiform, straight 1–3 septate, and G. F. verticillioides: microconidia in large chains observed on Petri dish under the low power of the microscope 10tx. The species identified morphologically were F. chlamydosporum (9.52%), F. napiforme (14.29%), F. poae (14.29%), F. pseudonygamai (23.8%), F. solani (14.29%), F. subglutinans (14.29%), and F. verticillioides (9.52%) (Table 2). Four species of Fusarium; F. napiforme (37.5%), F. solani (37.5%), F. subglutinans (12.5%), and F. verticillioides (12.5%), were obtained from symptomatic kernels, however from apparently healthy kernels five species were isolated out of which only two were present in both symptomatic and symptomless kernels; F. subglutinans (15.4%) and F. verticillioides (7.7%). The remaining Fusarium colonies belonged to three different species; F. chlamydosporum (15.4%), F. poae (23%), and F. pseudonygamai (38.5%). These results indicate that these species of Fusarium are latent inside the seed as reported by White and Munkvold and Desjardins [4, 5], and when the phytopathogenic species have appropriate environmental conditions they grow systemically and affect the crop, thus, becoming sources of dissemination of these pathogens to other areas. The seven species found are associated with other maize diseases, and were found throughout the plants. F. proliferatum, F. subgutinans, and F verticillioides have been isolated in leaf axil and other maize tissues during ear fill, while F. solani was only reported associated with maize in India [26, 27]. F. poae, and F. solani, which cause head blight and root rot in maize, are transmitted by seed [16, 28]. F. chlamydosporum, F. poae, and F. pseudonygamai have been associated with other gramineous species such as Pennisetum typhoides and Sorghum caffrorum [19]. Five of the species identified produce mycotoxins such as fusaric acid and/or fumonisin (F. napiforme, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides); fusarin (F. poae, and F. verticillioides), moniliformin (F. chlamydosporum, F. napiforme, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides); trichothecenes ({ogF. poae}) and naphthazarin (F. verticillioides) inmaize kernels [29]. F. pseudonygamai, and F. solani have not been reported to produce mycotoxins [21, 29, 30].

Analysis of ITS and nLSU regions

PCR was successfully performed and bands ((550 bp) were obtained. Each sequence was compared to sequences of the same species deposited at GenBank. Similarities ranged from 99.6% to 100%. Total nucleotides amplified were 470–533 bp and corresponded to the ITS1 and ITS2 complete regions; the 3′ portion of the 18S gene, 5.8S complete sequence, and the 5′ end of the 28S gene. PCR-products corresponding to nLSU gene were approximately 600 bp. With respect to ITS sequences, the isolate identified morphologically as F. chlamydosporum did not have any ITS sequence corresponding to the species deposited at GenBank database, so its closest relative was Fusarium spp. (AF158314) with a percentage of similarity of 98.6% (Table 3).
Table 3

Molecular characterization of 21 Fusarium isolates from symptomatic and symptomless ear rot of maize using ITS region in Mexico

IsolatesMorphological identificationAccession most related (Blast-GenBank)Value of AaSimilarity indexbDifference in nucleotidesProceeding
16F. chlamydosporum DQ297572Fusarium sp. AY21370610011000USA
17F. chlamydosporum DQ297573Fusarium sp. AY21370610011000USA
2F. napiforme DQ297553F. napiforme X94175100599.81Netherlands
4F. napiforme DQ297554F. napiforme X94175102199.62Netherlands
6F. napiforme DQ297555F. napiforme X9417510211000Netherlands
12F. poae DQ297556F. poae AY0534409631000Norway
15AF. poae DQ297557F. poae AY05344094299.80Norway
15BF. poae DQ297558F. poae AY0534409421000Norway
10BF. pseudonygamai DQ297559F. pseudonygamai U3456398599.81USA
13AF. pseudonygamai DQ297560F. pseudonygamai U3456310051000USA
13BF. pseudonygamai DQ297561F. pseudonygamai U3456310051000USA
18F. pseudonygamai DQ297562F. pseudonygamai U345639851000USA
19F. pseudonygamai DQ297563F. pseudonygamai U345639851000USA
3F. solani DQ297564F. solani AY75561797799.62Mexico
7F. solani DQ297565F. solani AY75561798999.62Mexico
8F. solani DQ297566F. solani AY755617101999.62Mexico
9F. subglutinans DQ297567F. subglutinans X9416799399.81Netherlands
11F. subglutinans DQ297568F. subglutinans X9416799999.81Netherlands
14F. subglutinans DQ297569F. subglutinans X94167101999.81Netherlands
5F. verticillioides DQ297570F. verticillioides AY533376104399.81Austria
10AF. verticillioides DQ297571F. verticillioides AY53337699999.81Austria

aAlignment.

bAlignment done with Lasergene 2001 V.5 software (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, USA).

Molecular characterization of 21 Fusarium isolates from symptomatic and symptomless ear rot of maize using ITS region in Mexico aAlignment. bAlignment done with Lasergene 2001 V.5 software (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, USA). The 28S rRNA gene partial sequences showed the same results as the ITS region. However, in the case of the isolate identified morphologically as F. chlamydosporum it was 98.6% equal to F. chlamydosporum (accession number AY213706). This result could be explained considering that for some species of Gibberella fujikuroi complex, the 28S gene gives a better resolution than ITS region. The ITS and nLSU sequences were deposited at Genbank NCBI (Table 3). Also, all isolates were placed in the Fungal Collection of Colegio de Postgraduados (registration on World Data Centre for Microorganisms in process). The species formed two clusters (Cluster I and II) (Figure 2). Cluster I had two groups (Group 1 and 2). Group 1 corresponded to two of the 16 sections as proposed by Wollenweber and Reinking [17] and both sections were in the G. fujikuroi complex [21]; Liseola section with F. pseudonygamai, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides, and Dlaminia section with F. napiforme. Group 2 also had two subgroups as evidenced by nucleotidic differences in the sequences of the isolates (Figure 3). F. pseudonygamai (DQ297559) had a cytosine at base 99 of ITS1, and not a thiamine as the other isolates of this species and F. napiforme (DQ297555) had a thiamine at base 99 of ITS1, and not a cytosine as in the isolate DQ297553. The isolate DQ 297554 of this species had a guanine at base 29, which corresponded to the beginning of the 28S gene. It also did not have a cytosine as in the other two isolates analysed in this same region (Figure 3). These results clearly show that these two species, as well as F. subglutinans, are separated into reproductively isolated populations that probably constitute separate sibling species [7], and in the future they may form different monophyletic species.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree based on ITS region of 21 Mexican isolates of Fusarium species obtained from ear rot (symptomatic and symptomless kernels) using Kimura 2 parameter substitution method. The evolutionary scheme was constructed with the neighbor-joining algorithm using MEGA 3.1 software. The confidence of the tree was assessed by bootstrap analysis based on 5000 replications.

Figure 3

Alignment showing differences in nucleotides: (A) ITS1 of Fusarium pseudonygamai, base 99 (asterisk). (B) ITS1 of F. napiforme, base 99 (asterisk). (C) 28S gene of F. napiforme, base 29 (asterisk).

Phylogenetic tree based on ITS region of 21 Mexican isolates of Fusarium species obtained from ear rot (symptomatic and symptomless kernels) using Kimura 2 parameter substitution method. The evolutionary scheme was constructed with the neighbor-joining algorithm using MEGA 3.1 software. The confidence of the tree was assessed by bootstrap analysis based on 5000 replications. Alignment showing differences in nucleotides: (A) ITS1 of Fusarium pseudonygamai, base 99 (asterisk). (B) ITS1 of F. napiforme, base 99 (asterisk). (C) 28S gene of F. napiforme, base 29 (asterisk). Group 2 included three isolates of F. poae, of the Sporotrichiella section. Isolate DQ297557 had a thiamine at the 438 base of ITS2, and not an adenine as in the other two isolates. In the cluster II there were the three F. solani isolates that have been grouped by Snyder and Hansen [18] in the Martiella y Ventricosum section of the F. solani complex [31]. Acremonium strictum was considered as and outgroup (Figure 3). The position of species in the Liseola and Dlaminia sections in the same group can be explained by the fact that both had Gibberella as the teleomorph, are part of the same complex, and produce moniliformin. The isolates identified as F. chlamydosporum, according to its morphology and considered as Fusarium spp. by ITS Blast search, included in the same group was unexpected because its teleomorph is unknown. However, it produces moniliformin [29], and this fact might reflect its relation with the other species. Through morphological and phylogenetic analysis, seven species of Fusarium identified as F. chlamydosporum, F. napiforme, F. poae, F. pseudonygamai, F. solani, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides, were found to be associated with ear rot disease, and F. chlamydosporum, F. poae, F. pseudonygamai, F. subglutinans, and F. verticillioides were found within asymptomatic kernels as well. Four of the identified species have not been reported previously to be associated with ear rot in Mexico. For this reason the biodiversity of Fusarium species involved in ear rot in Mexico appears to be greater than that reported previously in other places in the world. This new knowledge will permit a better understanding of the relationship between all the species involved in ear rot disease and their relationship with maize.
  6 in total

1.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Koichiro Tamura; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Leaf axil sampling of midwest U.S. maize for mycotoxigenic Fusarium fungi using PCR analysis.

Authors:  Patrick F Dowd; C Jason Barnett; Eric T Johnson; James J Beck
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers.

Authors:  Pamela K Anderson; Andrew A Cunningham; Nikkita G Patel; Francisco J Morales; Paul R Epstein; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Gibberella fujikuroi mating population E is associated with maize and teosinte.

Authors:  E T Steenkamp; T A Coutinho; A E Desjardins; B D Wingfield; W F Marasas; M J Wingfield
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.663

5.  Cryptic speciation in Fusarium subglutinans.

Authors:  Emma T Steenkamp; Brenda D Wingfield; Anne E Desjardins; Walter F O Marasas; Michael J Wingfield
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers are highly divergent in the phytopathogenic ascomycete Fusarium sambucinum (Gibberella pulicaris).

Authors:  K O'Donnell
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.886

  6 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Fusarium diseases of maize associated with mycotoxin contamination of agricultural products intended to be used for food and feed.

Authors:  Elisabeth Oldenburg; Frank Höppner; Frank Ellner; Joachim Weinert
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Fusarium species (section Liseola) occurrence and natural incidence of beauvericin, fusaproliferin and fumonisins in maize hybrids harvested in Mexico.

Authors:  Waldina P Reyes-Velázquez; Rosa M Figueroa-Gómez; Mauricio Barberis; María Marta Reynoso; Federico G A Rojo; Sofía N Chulze; Adriana M Torres
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Molecular identification of Fusarium species in Gibberella fujikuroi species complex from rice, sugarcane and maize from Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  Heng Mei Hsuan; Baharuddin Salleh; Latiffah Zakaria
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Diversity of toxic and phytopathogenic Fusarium species occurring on cereals grown in Karnataka state, India.

Authors:  H Nagaraja; G Chennappa; K Poorna Chandra Rao; G Mahadev Prasad; M Y Sreenivasa
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Genome-Wide Association Study and QTL Mapping Reveal Genomic Loci Associated with Fusarium Ear Rot Resistance in Tropical Maize Germplasm.

Authors:  Jiafa Chen; Rosemary Shrestha; Junqiang Ding; Hongjian Zheng; Chunhua Mu; Jianyu Wu; George Mahuku
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Mycobiota of maize seeds revealed by rDNA-ITS sequence analysis of samples with varying storage times.

Authors:  Hui-Qin Xing; Jian-Cang Ma; Bing-Liang Xu; Shu-Wu Zhang; Jin Wang; Li Cao; Xue-Mei Yang
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Relationship Analysis on Corn Stalk Rot and Ear Rot According to Fusarium Species and Fumonisin Contamination in Kernels.

Authors:  Lina Li; Qing Qu; Zhiyan Cao; Zhengyu Guo; Hui Jia; Ning Liu; Yanhui Wang; Jingao Dong
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Identification of a Fusarium ear rot resistance gene in maize by QTL mapping and RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Yusheng Xia; Baobao Wang; Lihong Zhu; Wenqi Wu; Suli Sun; Zhendong Zhu; Xinhai Li; Jianfeng Weng; Canxing Duan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Fusarium subglutinans: A new eumycetoma agent.

Authors:  Pablo Campos-Macías; Roberto Arenas-Guzmán; Francisca Hernández-Hernández
Journal:  Med Mycol Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-09

10.  Linkage mapping and genome-wide association study reveals conservative QTL and candidate genes for Fusarium rot resistance in maize.

Authors:  Yabin Wu; Zijian Zhou; Chaopei Dong; Jiafa Chen; Junqiang Ding; Xuecai Zhang; Cong Mu; Yuna Chen; Xiaopeng Li; Huimin Li; Yanan Han; Ruixia Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Jingjing Li; Xiaodong Dai; Weibin Song; Wei Chen; Jianyu Wu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.