Literature DB >> 17215752

TENS relieves acute posttraumatic hip pain during emergency transport.

Thomas Lang1, Renate Barker, Barbara Steinlechner, Burkhard Gustorff, Tivadar Puskas, Odette Gore, Alexander Kober.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Central Europe, ambulances for patients suffering from pain caused by nonlife-threatening trauma, such as hip fractures are staffed by medical personnel (medics) without physicians. Thus, there is an urgent need for nonpharmacological interventions that can be applied during the transport by basic life-support (BLS) medical personnel.
METHODS: In all, 101 patients were screened for participation in this randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study, and randomly assigned to two groups (verum and sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS]). First, medic A recorded all baseline parameters and measurements, then medic B performed TENS in absence of medic A. At the end of transportation, medic A performed data collection. Each patient was asked to grade his/her pain and anxiety level on visual analog scales (VAS, 0 to 100 mm).
RESULTS: From 101 screened patients fulfilling the entry criteria, 29 declined consent and 9 had to be excluded from the analysis because of their final diagnosis. Therefore, the data from 30 patients (group 1, verum TENS) as well as from 33 patients (group 2 [control], sham TENS) were analyzed. No significant differences in potentially influencing factors were found before treatment. Pain scores upon arrival at the hospital differed significantly between group 1 and group 2 (p < 0.01). In group 1, pain reduction was observed between departure from the site of emergency and arrival at the hospital (VAS: 89 +/- 9 to 59 +/- 6 mm), whereas pain scores remained nearly unchanged in group 2 (VAS: 86 +/- 12 to 79 +/- 11 mm).
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that TENS is a valuable and fast-acting pain treatment under the difficult circumstances of "out-of-hospital rescue". Because of its lack of side effects, it could also be a valuable tool in the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17215752     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197176.75598.fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain during venous cannulation.

Authors:  Saeyoung Kim; Kibum Park; Byungdoo Son; Younghoon Jeon
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 3.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 4.  Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of hyperalgesia and pain.

Authors:  Josimari M DeSantana; Deirdre M Walsh; Carol Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Nonpharmacological interventions for pain management in paramedicine and the emergency setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sok Cheon Pak; Peter S Micalos; Sonja J Maria; Bill Lord
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acute postoperative pain intensity and mobility after hip fracture: A double-blinded, randomized trial.

Authors:  Michal Elboim-Gabyzon; Sahar Andrawus Najjar; Haim Shtarker
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.