Literature DB >> 17215510

Intraspinal stimulation caudal to spinal cord transections in rats. Testing the propriospinal hypothesis.

Sergiy Yakovenko1, Jan Kowalczewski, Arthur Prochazka.   

Abstract

Many laboratories have reported the successful regeneration of neurons across damaged portions of the spinal cord. Associated improvements in hindlimb locomotor movements have been attributed to the formation of functional neuronal connections with the locomotor central pattern generator (CPG). However, regenerating axons generally extend no more than 10 mm caudal to the lesion sites, terminating about 20 mm short of the lumbar segments thought to contain the CPG. It has therefore tacitly been assumed that the locomotor improvements arose from activation of propriospinal neurons relaying excitation to the CPG. Here we report a test of this assumption, which we call the propriospinal hypothesis. Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) was used to activate the putative propriospinal relay neurons. Approximately 2-3 wk after complete spinal cord transection at T8-T9 in rats, an array of six Pt-Ir microwires was chronically implanted in the intermediate and ventral gray matter of T10-T12 segments. ISMS pulse trains with amplitudes of 0.8-0.9 times threshold for activating axial muscles were delivered during open-field locomotor tests (BBB). ISMS significantly increased BBB scores over control tests, but did not produce limb coordination and weight bearing sufficient for locomotion. These results support the main assumption of the propriospinal hypothesis: that neuronal activity elicited in thoracic spinal segments caudal to a complete spinal cord transection may propagate caudally and activate the locomotor CPG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17215510     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00814.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Kathryn G Todd; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Propriospinal neurons are sufficient for bulbospinal transmission of the locomotor command signal in the neonatal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Kristine C Cowley; Eugene Zaporozhets; Brian J Schmidt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Permissive Schwann cell graft/spinal cord interfaces for axon regeneration.

Authors:  Ryan R Williams; Martha Henao; Damien D Pearse; Mary Bartlett Bunge
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans.

Authors:  Claudia A Angeli; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Descending propriospinal neurons mediate restoration of locomotor function following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Katelyn N Benthall; Ryan A Hough; Andrew D McClellan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distribution and localization of 5-HT(1A) receptors in the rat lumbar spinal cord after transection and deafferentation.

Authors:  Chad K Otoshi; Wendy M Walwyn; Niranjala J K Tillakaratne; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Taccola; D Sayenko; P Gad; Y Gerasimenko; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Light-induced rescue of breathing after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Warren J Alilain; Xiang Li; Kevin P Horn; Rishi Dhingra; Thomas E Dick; Stefan Herlitze; Jerry Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Spinal primitives and intra-spinal micro-stimulation (ISMS) based prostheses: a neurobiological perspective on the "known unknowns" in ISMS and future prospects.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ian G Malone; Rachel L Nosacka; Marissa A Nash; Kevin J Otto; Erica A Dale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.