Literature DB >> 17215342

Correlation of Neo-Sensitabs tablet diffusion assay results on three different agar media with CLSI broth microdilution M27-A2 and disk diffusion M44-A results for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole.

A Espinel-Ingroff1, E Canton, D Gibbs, A Wang.   

Abstract

We compared the Neo-Sensitabs tablet assay to both reference M27-A2 broth microdilution and M44-A disk diffusion methods for testing susceptibilities of 110 isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole. Neo-Sensitabs assay inhibition zone diameters in millimeters on three agars (Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 2% dextrose and 0.5 microg/ml methylene blue [MGM], Shadomy [SHA], and RPMI 1640 [RPMI, 2% dextrose]) were obtained at 24 to 72 h. The correlation coefficient of Neo-Sensitabs results with MICs was similar to that of the disk method for most of the five agents on MGM (R, 0.80 to 0.89 versus 0.76 to 0.89, respectively). Overall, superior correlation was observed at 24 h for most agents. The exception was amphotericin B (R values of 0.68 and 0.5 for disk and tablet, respectively, at 48 h versus 0.68 and 0.48, respectively, at 24 h). In general, Neo-Sensitabs results were less consistent on SHA and RPMI agars. Although agreement by breakpoint category of Neo-Sensitabs and disk results with CLSI method M27-A2 was also similar on MGM (92.7 to 98.2% versus 95.5 to 100%, respectively), the Neo-Sensitabs method failed to identify two of the six isolates with high amphotericin B MICs. These data suggest the potential value of the Neo-Sensitabs assay for testing at least four of the five agents against yeasts evaluated in the clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17215342      PMCID: PMC1829139          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01900-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Correlation between E-test, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole and voriconazole.

Authors:  Madonna J Matar; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Victor L Paetznick; Jose R Rodriguez; Enuo Chen; John H Rex
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species.

Authors:  Frank C Odds; Mary Motyl; Roberto Andrade; Jacques Bille; Emilia Cantón; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Amanda Davidson; Christian Durussel; David Ellis; Elyse Foraker; Annette W Fothergill; Mahmoud A Ghannoum; Robert A Giacobbe; Miguel Gobernado; Rosemary Handke; Michel Laverdière; Wendy Lee-Yang; William G Merz; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Javier Pemán; Sophia Perea; John R Perfect; Michael A Pfaller; Laurie Proia; John H Rex; Michael G Rinaldi; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Wiley A Schell; Christine Shields; Deanna A Sutton; Paul E Verweij; David W Warnock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Lot-to-lot variability of antibiotic medium 3 used for testing susceptibility of Candida isolates to amphotericin B.

Authors:  M Lozano-Chiu; P W Nelson; M Lancaster; M A Pfaller; J H Rex
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1,586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by Broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods: report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; S A Messer; L Boyken; R J Hollis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Tablet sensitivity testing on pathogenic fungi.

Authors:  J B Casals
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study: a 6.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole by standardized disk diffusion testing.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; M G Rinaldi; R Barnes; B Hu; A V Veselov; N Tiraboschi; E Nagy; D L Gibbs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of fluconazole-resistant Candida strains by a disc diffusion screening test.

Authors:  P Sandven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States.

Authors:  Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; John H Rex; Peter G Pappas; Richard J Hamill; Robert A Larsen; Harold W Horowitz; William G Powderly; Newton Hyslop; Carol A Kauffman; John Cleary; Julie E Mangino; Jeannette Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Evaluation of the NCCLS M44-P disk diffusion method for determining susceptibilities of 276 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans to fluconazole.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of results obtained by testing with three different agar media and by the NCCLS M27-A method for in vitro testing of fluconazole against Candida spp.

Authors:  M Carmen Rubio; Joaquina Gil; Inmaculada Ramírez De Ocáriz; Rafael Benito; Antonio Rezusta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Neo-Sensitabs tablet diffusion assay with CLSI broth microdilution M38-A and disk diffusion methods for testing susceptibility of filamentous fungi with amphotericin B, caspofungin, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; E Canton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; V Chaturvedi; D J Diekema; M A Ghannoum; N M Holliday; S B Killian; C C Knapp; S A Messer; A Miskov; R Ramani
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Voriconazole pharmacokinetics and safety in immunocompromised children compared to adult patients.

Authors:  Claudia Michael; Uta Bierbach; Katrin Frenzel; Thoralf Lange; Nadezda Basara; Dietger Niederwieser; Christine Mauz-Körholz; Rainer Preiss
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of 24-hour and 48-hour voriconazole MICs as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) in three laboratories: results obtained with 2,162 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and other yeasts.

Authors:  Ana Espinel-Ingroff; E Canton; J Peman; M G Rinaldi; A W Fothergill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison between disk diffusion and microdilution methods for determining susceptibility of clinical fungal isolates to caspofungin.

Authors:  Maria Eleonora Milici; Carmelo Massimo Maida; Elisabetta Spreghini; Barbara Ravazzolo; Salvatore Oliveri; Giorgio Scalise; Francesco Barchiesi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Fungemia at a tertiary care hospital: incidence, therapy, and distribution and antifungal susceptibility of causative species.

Authors:  K Lagrou; J Verhaegen; W E Peetermans; T De Rijdt; J Maertens; E Van Wijngaerden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Antifungal susceptibility and phenotypic characterization of oral isolates of a black fungus from a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient under radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chaminda Jayampath Seneviratne; Phoenix H L Fong; Sarah S W Wong; Victor H F Lee
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole in pediatric patients with neutropenia.

Authors:  M Döring; M Eikemeier; K M Cabanillas Stanchi; U Hartmann; M Ebinger; C-P Schwarze; A Schulz; R Handgretinger; I Müller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Comparison of itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole as oral antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  M Döring; O Blume; S Haufe; U Hartmann; A Kimmig; C-P Schwarze; P Lang; R Handgretinger; I Müller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Susceptibility tests of oropharyngeal Candida albicans from egyptian patients to fluconazole determined by three methods.

Authors:  Noha El-Mashad; Mona F Foad; Niveen Saudy; Dalia A Salem
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.