Literature DB >> 17214675

Fractional photothermolysis: treatment of facial and nonfacial cutaneous photodamage with a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser.

Molly Wanner1, Elizabeth L Tanzi, Tina S Alster.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel nonablative 1,550 nm erbium-doped fiber laser in the treatment of facial and non-facial photodamaged skin.
METHODS: 50 patients with mild to moderate cutaneous photodamage, rhytides, and dyspigmentation received 3 successive treatments at 3-4 week intervals with a 1,550 nm erbium-doped fiber laser (Fraxel, Reliant Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA). Clinical improvement of treatment areas was independently determined by two masked assessors' evaluations of comparative photographs at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months post-treatment using a quartile grading scale. Patient satisfaction surveys were also obtained at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Mean clinical improvement at 3 months for the face was 2.23 and 1.85 for non-facial skin (p<0.001). Mean improvement at 6 months was 2.10 for the face and 1.81 for non-facial skin (p<0.001). Mean improvement at 9 months was 1.96 for the face and 1.70 for non-facial skin (p<0.001). At least 51% to 75% improvement in photodamage at the 9-month follow-up was achieved in 73 and 55% of facial and non-facial treated skin, respectively. Side effects were limited to transient erythema and edema in the majority of patients. No prolonged pigmentary changes or scarring were observed. Patient satisfaction surveys mirrored the observed clinical effects.
CONCLUSION: The nonablative 1,550 nm erbium-doped fiber laser is an effective treatment for facial and non-facial photodamage, rhytides, and dyspigmentation with a favorable recovery and side effect profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17214675     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33003.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  11 in total

1.  Update on fractional laser technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-01

Review 2.  Dermatologic Laser Side Effects and Complications: Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Tina S Alster; Monica K Li
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.403

3.  Treatment of actinic keratoses and photodamage with non-contact fractional 1540-nm laser quasi-ablation: an ex vivo and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Moshe Lapidoth; Maurice Adatto; Shlomit Halachmi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  [Fractional photothermolysis: a new option for treating melasma?].

Authors:  S Karsai; C Raulin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Current Laser Resurfacing Technologies: A Review that Delves Beneath the Surface.

Authors:  Jason Preissig; Kristy Hamilton; Ramsey Markus
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Anesthesia methods in laser resurfacing.

Authors:  Sergio Gaitan; Ramsey Markus
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Fractional nonablative 1,540-nm laser resurfacing of atrophic acne scars. A randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation.

Authors:  Lene Hedelund; Karen Estell R Moreau; Ditte M Beyer; Peter Nymann; Merete Haedersdal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 8.  Fractional photothermolysis--an update.

Authors:  Inja Bogdan Allemann; Joely Kaufman
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Fractional CO2 Laser Versus Intense Pulsed Light in Treating Striae Distensae.

Authors:  Moustafa Adam El Taieb; Ahmed Khair Ibrahim
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 10.  The role of lasers and intense pulsed light technology in dermatology.

Authors:  Zain Husain; Tina S Alster
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.