Literature DB >> 17214343

Ovarian cancer screening.

M Kyrgiou1, I Tsoumpou, P Martin-Hirsch, M Arbyn, W Prendiville, G Koliopoulos, N Dalkalitsis, P Stamatopoulos, E Paraskevaidis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This review presents the current knowledge on ovarian cancer screening (OCS) together with a cumulative evaluation of the efficacy across diverse screening approaches based on up-to-date results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted targeting reports on the effectiveness of the various screening strategies.
RESULTS: Twenty-two prospective studies, 18 cohorts and 4 randomised control trials (RCTs) were retrieved. Where possible, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, as well as the number needed to treat for each cancer (NNT) and each stage I disease [NNT (I)] detected are reported.
CONCLUSION: The multimodal approach that incorporates CA125 as a primary and ultrasound as a secondary test appears to be superior to other strategies. However, the conclusive end-point that would provide the acceptable level of evidence for the introduction of screening should be a reduction in mortality. Up-to-date, there is no such evidence to justify this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17214343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  2 in total

1.  Health care use and risk of ovarian cancer: is there a link?

Authors:  Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Melissa Brouwers; Thomas K Oliver; Barry Rosen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Deep depletion of abundant serum proteins reveals low-abundant proteins as potential biomarkers for human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Biaoyang Lin; James T White; Jian Wu; Shashikant Lele; Lloyd J Old; Leroy Hood; Kunle Odunsi
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.494

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.