Literature DB >> 17213493

The prevalence and inaccessibility of Internet references in the biomedical literature at the time of publication.

Dominik Aronsky1, Sina Madani, Randy J Carnevale, Stephany Duda, Michael T Feyder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and inaccessibility of Internet references in the bibliography of biomedical publications when first released in PubMed.
METHODS: During a one-month observational study period (Feb 21 to Mar 21, 2006) the Internet citations from a 20% random sample of all forthcoming publications released in PubMed during the previous day were identified. Attempts to access the referenced Internet citations were completed within one day and inaccessible Internet citations were recorded.
RESULTS: The study included 4,699 publications from 844 different journals. Among the 141,845 references there were 840 (0.6%) Internet citations. One or more Internet references were cited in 403 (8.6%) articles. From the 840 Internet references, 11.9% were already inaccessible within two days after an article's release to the public.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of Internet citations in journals included in PubMed is small (<1%); however, the inaccessibility rate at the time of publication is considered substantial. Authors, editors, and publishers need to take responsibility for providing accurate and accessible Internet references.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17213493      PMCID: PMC2213465          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  14 in total

1.  Internet citations in oncology journals: a vanishing resource?

Authors:  Eric J Hester; Lauren F Heilig; Amanda L Drake; Kathryn R Johnson; Catherine T Vu; Lisa M Schilling; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  404 not found: the stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Jonathan D Wren
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Accuracy of references in five biomedical informatics journals.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Joel Ransom; Kevin Robinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Accessibility and accuracy of web page references in 5 major medical journals.

Authors:  Renée Crichlow; Nicole Winbush; Stefanie Davies
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Accessibility and longevity of Internet citations in a clinical AIDS journal.

Authors:  Emily Olfson; Jeffrey Laurence
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.078

6.  Unavailability of online supplementary scientific information from articles published in major journals.

Authors:  Evangelos Evangelou; Thomas A Trikalinos; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.

Authors:  J T Evans; H I Nadjari; S A Burchell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?

Authors:  G de Lacey; C Record; J Wade
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-28

9.  Inaccurate references in significant journals of science.

Authors:  R K Poyer
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1979-10

10.  Going, going, still there: using the WebCite service to permanently archive cited web pages.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Mathieu Trudel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  7 in total

1.  Disappearing act: decay of uniform resource locators in health care management journals.

Authors:  Cassie Wagner; Meseret D Gebremichael; Mary K Taylor; Michael J Soltys
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-04

2.  Decay of references to Web sites in articles published in general medical journals: mainstream vs small journals.

Authors:  P Habibzadeh
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Accuracy of the references in JIAPS.

Authors:  Anup Mohta
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-07

4.  Scholarly context not found: one in five articles suffers from reference rot.

Authors:  Martin Klein; Herbert Van de Sompel; Robert Sanderson; Harihar Shankar; Lyudmila Balakireva; Ke Zhou; Richard Tobin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé; Paula Riganti; Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso; Rhéda Adekpedjou; Alexandrine Boucher; Andressa Teoli Nunciaroni; Juan Victor Ariel Franco; Maria Victoria Ruiz Yanzi; France Légaré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attrition of Canadian Internet pharmacy websites: what are the implications?

Authors:  Michael A Veronin; Kristen M Clancy
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-08-15

7.  A cross disciplinary study of link decay and the effectiveness of mitigation techniques.

Authors:  Jason Hennessey; Steven Ge
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.