BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologic markers in multicenter trials are often confounded by different instrumentation used. Our goal was to estimate the variance of the global concentration of the neuronal cell marker N-acetylaspartate (NAA) among research centers using MR imaging scanners of different models, from different manufacturers, and of different magnetic field strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absolute millimolar amounts of whole-brain NAA (WBNAA) were quantified with nonlocalizing proton MR spectroscopy in the brains of 101 healthy subjects (53 women, 48 men) aged 16-59 years (mean, 34.2 years). Twenty-three were scanned at 1 institute in a 1.5T Siemens Vision; 31 from another institute were studied with a 1.5T Siemens SP63; 36 were scanned at a third institute (24 with a 1.5T Vision, 12 with a 3T Siemens Trio); and 11 were obtained at a fourth institute using a 4T GE Signa 5.x. The NAA amounts were quantified with phantom-replacement and divided by the brain volume, segmented from MR imaging, to yield the concentration, a metric independent of brain size suitable for cross-sectional comparison. RESULTS: The average WBNAA concentration among institutions was 12.2 +/- 1.2 mmol/L. The subjects' WBNAA distributions did not differ significantly (p > .237) among the 4 centers, regardless of scanner manufacturer, model, or field strength and irrespective of whether adjustments were made for age or sex. CONCLUSION: Absolute quantification against a standard makes the WBNAA concentration insensitive to the MR hardware used to acquire it. This important attribute renders it a robust surrogate marker for multicenter neurologic trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologic markers in multicenter trials are often confounded by different instrumentation used. Our goal was to estimate the variance of the global concentration of the neuronal cell marker N-acetylaspartate (NAA) among research centers using MR imaging scanners of different models, from different manufacturers, and of different magnetic field strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absolute millimolar amounts of whole-brain NAA (WBNAA) were quantified with nonlocalizing proton MR spectroscopy in the brains of 101 healthy subjects (53 women, 48 men) aged 16-59 years (mean, 34.2 years). Twenty-three were scanned at 1 institute in a 1.5T Siemens Vision; 31 from another institute were studied with a 1.5T Siemens SP63; 36 were scanned at a third institute (24 with a 1.5T Vision, 12 with a 3T Siemens Trio); and 11 were obtained at a fourth institute using a 4T GE Signa 5.x. The NAA amounts were quantified with phantom-replacement and divided by the brain volume, segmented from MR imaging, to yield the concentration, a metric independent of brain size suitable for cross-sectional comparison. RESULTS: The average WBNAA concentration among institutions was 12.2 +/- 1.2 mmol/L. The subjects' WBNAA distributions did not differ significantly (p > .237) among the 4 centers, regardless of scanner manufacturer, model, or field strength and irrespective of whether adjustments were made for age or sex. CONCLUSION: Absolute quantification against a standard makes the WBNAA concentration insensitive to the MR hardware used to acquire it. This important attribute renders it a robust surrogate marker for multicenter neurologic trials.
Authors: M P Sormani; G Iannucci; M A Rocca; G Mastronardo; M Cercignani; L Minicucci; M Filippi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Filippi; J H van Waesberghe; M A Horsfield; S Bressi; C Gasperini; T A Yousry; M L Gawne-Cain; S P Morrissey; M A Rocca; F Barkhof; G J Lycklama à Nijeholt; S Bastianello; D H Miller Journal: Neurology Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: P D Molyneux; P A Brex; C Fogg; S Lewis; C Middleditch; F Barkhof; M P Sormani; M Filippi; D H Miller Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jean-Pierre Dollé; Jeffrey M Rodgers; Kevin D Browne; Thomas Troxler; Feng Gai; Douglas H Smith Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Lidia Glodzik; Marc Sollberger; Achim Gass; Amit Gokhale; Henry Rusinek; James S Babb; Jochen G Hirsch; Michael Amann; Andreas U Monsch; Oded Gonen Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: William E Wu; Achim Gass; Lidia Glodzik; James S Babb; Jochen Hirsch; Marc Sollberger; Lutz Achtnichts; Michael Amann; Andreas U Monsch; Oded Gonen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: D J Rigotti; A Gass; L Achtnichts; M Inglese; J S Babb; Y Naegelin; J Hirsch; M Amann; L Kappos; O Gonen Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: D J Rigotti; O Gonen; R I Grossman; J S Babb; A Falini; B Benedetti; M Filippi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Matilde Inglese; Henry Rusinek; Ilena C George; James S Babb; Robert I Grossman; Oded Gonen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: G Schifitto; C T Yiannoutsos; T Ernst; B A Navia; A Nath; N Sacktor; C Anderson; C M Marra; D B Clifford Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 9.910