Literature DB >> 17212486

Performance of density functionals for first row transition metal systems.

Kasper P Jensen1, Björn O Roos, Ulf Ryde.   

Abstract

This article investigates the performance of five commonly used density functionals, B3LYP, BP86, PBE0, PBE, and BLYP, for studying diatomic molecules consisting of a first row transition metal bonded to H, F, Cl, Br, N, C, O, or S. Results have been compared with experiment wherever possible. Open-shell configurations are found more often in the order PBE0>B3LYP>PBE approximately BP86>BLYP. However, on average, 58 of 63 spins are correctly predicted by any functional, with only small differences. BP86 and PBE are slightly better for obtaining geometries, with errors of only 0.020 A. Hybrid functionals tend to overestimate bond lengths by a few picometers and underestimate bond strengths by favoring open shells. Nonhybrid functionals usually overestimate bond energies. All functionals exhibit similar errors in bond energies, between 42 and 53 kJmol. Late transition metals are found to be better modeled by hybrid functionals, whereas nonhybrid functionals tend to have less of a preference. There are systematic errors in predicting certain properties that could be remedied. BLYP performs the best for ionization potentials studied here, PBE0 the worst. In other cases, errors are similar. Finally, there is a clear tendency for hybrid functionals to give larger dipole moments than nonhybrid functionals. These observations may be helpful in choosing and improving existing functionals for tasks involving transition metals, and for designing new, improved functionals.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17212486     DOI: 10.1063/1.2406071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  10 in total

1.  Density functional localized orbital corrections for transition metals.

Authors:  David Rinaldo; Li Tian; Jeremy N Harvey; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Hydrogenase Enzymes and Their Synthetic Models: The Role of Metal Hydrides.

Authors:  David Schilter; James M Camara; Mioy T Huynh; Sharon Hammes-Schiffer; Thomas B Rauchfuss
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Metal Ion Modeling Using Classical Mechanics.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Density functional theory study of small nickel clusters.

Authors:  Satyender Goel; Artem E Masunov
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Theoretical analysis of the binding of iron(III) protoporphyrin IX to 4-methoxyacetophenone thiosemicarbazone via DFT-D3, MEP, QTAIM, NCI, ELF, and LOL studies.

Authors:  Nyiang Kennet Nkungli; Julius Numbonui Ghogomu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Factors controlling the reactivity of divalent metal ions towards pheophytin a.

Authors:  Ł Orzeł; J Waś; A Kania; A Susz; D Rutkowska-Zbik; J Staroń; M Witko; G Stochel; L Fiedor
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  ChemSpaX: exploration of chemical space by automated functionalization of molecular scaffold.

Authors:  Adarsh V Kalikadien; Evgeny A Pidko; Vivek Sinha
Journal:  Digit Discov       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Molecular Structure, Thermodynamic and Spectral Characteristics of Metal-Free and Nickel Complex of Tetrakis(1,2,5-thiadiazolo)porphyrazine.

Authors:  Yuriy A Zhabanov; Alexey V Eroshin; Igor V Ryzhov; Ilya A Kuzmin; Daniil N Finogenov; Pavel A Stuzhin
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Two-step model for ultrafast interfacial electron transfer: limitations of Fermi's golden rule revealed by quantum dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Elena Jakubikova
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Seeing Is Believing: Experimental Spin States from Machine Learning Model Structure Predictions.

Authors:  Michael G Taylor; Tzuhsiung Yang; Sean Lin; Aditya Nandy; Jon Paul Janet; Chenru Duan; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.