Literature DB >> 17211805

The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory.

Andy Gardner1, Stuart A West, Nicholas H Barton.   

Abstract

Evolution at multiple gene positions is complicated. Direct selection on one gene disturbs the evolutionary dynamics of associated genes. Recent years have seen the development of a multilocus methodology for modeling evolution at arbitrary numbers of gene positions with arbitrary dominance and epistatic relations, mode of inheritance, genetic linkage, and recombination. We show that the approach is conceptually analogous to social evolutionary methodology, which focuses on selection acting on associated individuals. In doing so, we (1) make explicit the links between the multilocus methodology and the foundations of social evolution theory, namely, Price's theorem and Hamilton's rule; (2) relate the multilocus approach to levels-of-selection and neighbor-modulated-fitness approaches in social evolution; (3) highlight the equivalence between genetical hitchhiking and kin selection; (4) demonstrate that the multilocus methodology allows for social evolutionary analyses involving coevolution of multiple traits and genetical associations between nonrelatives, including individuals of different species; (5) show that this methodology helps solve problems of dynamic sufficiency in social evolution theory; (6) form links between invasion criteria in multilocus systems and Hamilton's rule of kin selection; (7) illustrate the generality and exactness of Hamilton's rule, which has previously been described as an approximate, heuristic result.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17211805     DOI: 10.1086/510602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  42 in total

1.  Promiscuity and the evolution of cooperative breeding.

Authors:  Helen C Leggett; Claire El Mouden; Geoff Wild; Stuart West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Defining fitness in evolutionary models.

Authors:  Derek A Roff
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 6.  Fundamental concepts in genetics: genetics and the understanding of selection.

Authors:  Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Levels of selection on threshold characters.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Formalizing Darwinism and inclusive fitness theory.

Authors:  Alan Grafen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The evolution of society.

Authors:  T Clutton-Brock; S West; F Ratnieks; R Foley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  In defence of inclusive fitness theory.

Authors:  Edward Allen Herre; William T Wcislo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.