Literature DB >> 17211711

Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

Min-Chan Kim1, Ghap-Joong Jung, Hyung-Ho Kim.   

Abstract

Gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection has not been generally acceptable because of increased morbidity and mortality in some Western countries. Recently, many surgeons have become interested in laparoscopic gastric surgery for malignant disease as well as benign lesions because laparoscopic surgery itself has been shown to have many advantages over open surgery. The aims of this study are to evaluate the incidence and nature of operative morbidity and mortality after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) with extraperigastric lymph node dissection with respect to surgical experience and to identify factors predictive of complications and death. We reviewed the surgical outcomes of LAG with extraperigastric lymph node dissection in 140 consecutive gastric cancer patients. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative morbidities and mortalities were compared after dividing the 140 patients into early (1-70) and late (71-140) groups. And risk factors for morbidity and mortality were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The overall operative morbidity and mortality rates were 18.6% and 0.7%, respectively. Thirty postoperative complications occurred in 26 patients. The minor surgical complication rate in the late group was significantly lower than that in the early group (P = 0.0349). According to univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the independent predictor of a higher operative morbidity rate, no factor was significantly associated with operative morbidity. We conclude that LAG with extraperigastric lymph node dissection is a technically feasible and acceptable surgical modality for gastric cancer and low morbidity and mortality rates for this procedure can be accomplished by experienced laparoscopic gastric surgeons at large-volume hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17211711     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9317-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer: our 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kenji Kakisako; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  K Yasuda; K Sonoda; H Shiroshita; M Inomata; N Shiraishi; S Kitano
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Radical surgery for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experience.

Authors:  Y Noguchi; T Imada; A Matsumoto; D G Coit; M F Brennan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study.

Authors:  M Degiuli; M Sasako; A Ponti; T Soldati; F Danese; F Calvo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Min-Chan Kim; Ki-Han Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Ghap-Joong Jung
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality.

Authors:  K Maruyama; K Okabayashi; T Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Extensive versus limited lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a comparative study of 320 patients.

Authors:  F Pacelli; G B Doglietto; R Bellantone; S Alfieri; A Sgadari; F Crucitti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; B J Kennedy; J Chmiel; G Steele; D Winchester; R Osteen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Jian-Cheng Tu; Jian Fang; Liang Zhou; Ye-Lu Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is an ugly duckling with unsolved concerns: oncological safety, late complications, and functional benefit.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Ju Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Yong Son; Chang-Min Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Lijun Zheng; Liesheng Lu; Xun Jiang; Wei Jian; Zhongchen Liu; Donglei Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Role of 3DCT in laparoscopic total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Jia-Bin Wang; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared to open standard surgery for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Hiroyuki Kawano; Mitsuhiko Ohta; Daisuke Yoshida; Kazuhito Minami; Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Yasushi Toh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Moon-Soo Lee; Ju-Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  General complications following laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and analysis of techniques to manage them.

Authors:  T Bo; P Zhihong; Y Peiwu; Q Feng; W Ziqiang; S Yan; Z Yongliang; L Huaxin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Previous laparotomy is not a contraindication to laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Msanori Tokunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Yasuyuki Seto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Use of a clinical pathway in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hee Sung Kim; Sun Oak Kim; Byung Sik Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.