BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The neuromedin U (NMU) receptors, NMU1 and NMU2, are expressed in the gut but their functions are unclear. This study explores the role of NMU in gastrointestinal motility. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of NMU were examined in the forestomach and colon isolated from NMU2R wild-type and NMU2R-/- (knockout) mice, looking for changes in muscle tension and in nerve-mediated responses evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS), and in models of peristalsis in mouse colon and faecal pellet transit in guinea-pig colon. KEY RESULTS: In the mouse forestomach, NMU (1 nM-10 microM) concentration-dependently induced muscle contraction, in the presence of tetrodotoxin and atropine, in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice (pEC50: 7.9, 7.6, Emax: 0.26, 0.20g tension, respectively, n=8 each concentration). The same concentrations of NMU had no consistent effects on the responses to EFS (n=8). In the mouse colon, NMU (0.1 nM-1 microM) had no significant effect on baseline muscle tension (n=8), but concentration-dependently potentiated EFS-evoked contractions in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice, pEC50: 8.1, 7.8, Emax: 24%, 21%, respectively, n=6-11. NMU (0.01 nM-0.1 microM, n=5-7) concentration-dependently decreased the interval between waves of peristalsis in the mouse colon (pEC50: 8.8) and increased the rate at which a faecal pellet moved along the guinea-pig colon. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that NMU exerts colon-specific, nerve-mediated, prokinetic activity, via a pathway involving activation of NMU1 receptors. This suggests that this receptor may represent a molecular target for the treatment of intestinal motility disorders.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The neuromedin U (NMU) receptors, NMU1 and NMU2, are expressed in the gut but their functions are unclear. This study explores the role of NMU in gastrointestinal motility. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of NMU were examined in the forestomach and colon isolated from NMU2R wild-type and NMU2R-/- (knockout) mice, looking for changes in muscle tension and in nerve-mediated responses evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS), and in models of peristalsis in mouse colon and faecal pellet transit in guinea-pig colon. KEY RESULTS: In the mouse forestomach, NMU (1 nM-10 microM) concentration-dependently induced muscle contraction, in the presence of tetrodotoxin and atropine, in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice (pEC50: 7.9, 7.6, Emax: 0.26, 0.20g tension, respectively, n=8 each concentration). The same concentrations of NMU had no consistent effects on the responses to EFS (n=8). In the mouse colon, NMU (0.1 nM-1 microM) had no significant effect on baseline muscle tension (n=8), but concentration-dependently potentiated EFS-evoked contractions in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice, pEC50: 8.1, 7.8, Emax: 24%, 21%, respectively, n=6-11. NMU (0.01 nM-0.1 microM, n=5-7) concentration-dependently decreased the interval between waves of peristalsis in the mouse colon (pEC50: 8.8) and increased the rate at which a faecal pellet moved along the guinea-pig colon. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that NMU exerts colon-specific, nerve-mediated, prokinetic activity, via a pathway involving activation of NMU1 receptors. This suggests that this receptor may represent a molecular target for the treatment of intestinal motility disorders.
Authors: R Raddatz; A E Wilson; R Artymyshyn; J A Bonini; B Borowsky; L W Boteju; S Zhou; E V Kouranova; R Nagorny; M S Guevarra; M Dai; G S Lerman; P J Vaysse; T A Branchek; C Gerald; C Forray; N Adham Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-10-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J A Hedrick; K Morse; L Shan; X Qiao; L Pang; S Wang; T Laz; E L Gustafson; M Bayne; F J Monsma Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: A D Howard; R Wang; S S Pong; T N Mellin; A Strack; X M Guan; Z Zeng; D L Williams; S D Feighner; C N Nunes; B Murphy; J N Stair; H Yu; Q Jiang; M K Clements; C P Tan; K K McKee; D L Hreniuk; T P McDonald; K R Lynch; J F Evans; C P Austin; C T Caskey; L H Van der Ploeg; Q Liu Journal: Nature Date: 2000-07-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P G Szekeres; A I Muir; L D Spinage; J E Miller; S I Butler; A Smith; G I Rennie; P R Murdock; L R Fitzgerald; H l Wu; L J McMillan; S Guerrera; L Vawter; N A Elshourbagy; J L Mooney; D J Bergsma; S Wilson; J K Chambers Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-07-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Hosoya; T Moriya; Y Kawamata; S Ohkubo; R Fujii; H Matsui; Y Shintani; S Fukusumi; Y Habata; S Hinuma; H Onda; O Nishimura; M Fujino Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-09-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: L Shan; X Qiao; J H Crona; J Behan; S Wang; T Laz; M Bayne; E L Gustafson; F J Monsma; J A Hedrick Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Timothy D Westfall; Gerald P McCafferty; Mark Pullen; Susan Gruver; Anthony C Sulpizio; V Nambi Aiyar; Jyoti Disa; Lisa C Contino; Ishrat J Mannan; J Paul Hieble Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.030