PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation technique (scleral incision) with the scleral flap surgical technique as regards to efficacy, surgical complications, advantages, disadvantages, and surgery costs in cases with no capsular support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted on thirty patients (30 eyes), ten of whom were aphakic, eleven had traumatic cataract, seven had post-phacoemulsification complications, and two had lens luxation. The patients were divided into two groups (I - scleral incision technique and II - scleral flap technique) of fifteen patients each, during a study period lasting eighteen months. The great majority of the procedures were performed under general anesthesia and by the same surgeon. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS. The numerical variables were compared using the t test and the categorical ones using the Fisher exact test. We performed multifactorial analysis to build a model that could predict and compare the complications associated with each technique. An explicative model was built using logistic regression. RESULTS: We observed a threefold higher rate of complications associated with the scleral flap technique when compared to the scleral incision technique. This difference was particularly relevant as regards the occurrence of free scleral flap and hyphema. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding vitreous hemorrhage, choroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, difficulty in the external pulling of the Prolene suture, breaking of the Prolene suture, and anterior chamber collapse. We found a significant association between intraoperative complications and the technique used (higher number of complications with the scleral flap) and also with some systemic diseases (patients with hypertension had more intraoperative complications). The number of late complications resulting from the scleral flap technique was much higher than those observed with the scleral incision technique; however, the number of the cases we studied is insufficient to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The duration of the procedure using the IOL scleral incision technique is significantly lower than using the scleral flap technique. Intraoperative complications were significantly associated with the technique used: more frequent with scleral flap. Late complications were mainly associated with systemic and previous ocular diseases.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation technique (scleral incision) with the scleral flap surgical technique as regards to efficacy, surgical complications, advantages, disadvantages, and surgery costs in cases with no capsular support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted on thirty patients (30 eyes), ten of whom were aphakic, eleven had traumatic cataract, seven had post-phacoemulsification complications, and two had lens luxation. The patients were divided into two groups (I - scleral incision technique and II - scleral flap technique) of fifteen patients each, during a study period lasting eighteen months. The great majority of the procedures were performed under general anesthesia and by the same surgeon. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS. The numerical variables were compared using the t test and the categorical ones using the Fisher exact test. We performed multifactorial analysis to build a model that could predict and compare the complications associated with each technique. An explicative model was built using logistic regression. RESULTS: We observed a threefold higher rate of complications associated with the scleral flap technique when compared to the scleral incision technique. This difference was particularly relevant as regards the occurrence of free scleral flap and hyphema. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding vitreous hemorrhage, choroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, difficulty in the external pulling of the Prolene suture, breaking of the Prolene suture, and anterior chamber collapse. We found a significant association between intraoperative complications and the technique used (higher number of complications with the scleral flap) and also with some systemic diseases (patients with hypertension had more intraoperative complications). The number of late complications resulting from the scleral flap technique was much higher than those observed with the scleral incision technique; however, the number of the cases we studied is insufficient to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The duration of the procedure using the IOL scleral incision technique is significantly lower than using the scleral flap technique. Intraoperative complications were significantly associated with the technique used: more frequent with scleral flap. Late complications were mainly associated with systemic and previous ocular diseases.