Literature DB >> 17211203

Arterial and venous complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in burn patients.

Jeffrey R Scott1, Matthew B Klein, Terri Gernsheimer, Shari Honari, Janet Gibbons, Nicole S Gibran.   

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated complication of heparin treatment that can result in a number of devastating thrombotic complications. Given the common use of heparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with burns, we reviewed the incidence and complications of HIT in our burn center. We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with heparin at our burn center who underwent testing for HIT from 2001 to 2005. Screening for HIT was performed by platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunoassay. Records were reviewed with particular attention to indications for HIT testing, duration of heparin therapy, type of heparin used (fractionated vs unfractionated), indication for heparin use (prophylactic vs therapeutic), treatment of HIT, and complications of HIT. During the 4-year study period, 625 patients received heparin therapy at some point during their hospital course. Of these patients, 43 (6.9%) underwent testing for HIT and 10 of the 43 screened patients (23%) were positive; the incidence among all heparinized burn patients was 1.6%. Thrombotic complications of HIT included arterial thrombosis requiring limb amputation (two patients), deep venous thrombosis (three patients), and pulmonary embolism (two patients). One patient died, presumably secondary to a pulmonary embolism. All patients were anticoagulated after HIT diagnosis, and four patients developed bleeding complications. HIT is a potentially devastating complication of heparin administration. Whereas our overall incidence of HIT was low, HIT+ patients developed significant complications, including arterial and venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, limb loss, and death. Treatment for such HIT-related thromboses usually resulted in bleeding complications requiring transfusions. The routine use of heparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis needs to be carefully considered in light of these potential complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17211203     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013E31802C8929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  5 in total

1.  Early fasciotomy in electrically injured patients as a marker for injury severity and deep venous thrombosis risk: an analysis of the National Burn Repository.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Nicholas H Osborne; Reda M Jaber; Paul S Cederna; Wendy L Wahl
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Blood utilization in patients with burn injury and association with clinical outcomes (CME).

Authors:  Rommel P Lu; Feng-Chang Lin; Shiara M Ortiz-Pujols; Sasha D Adams; Herbert C Whinna; Bruce A Cairns; Nigel S Key
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Acquired inpatient risk factors for venous thromboembolism after thermal injury.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Nicholas H Osborne; Hyun Soo Park; Wendy L Wahl
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Temporal changes in deep venous thrombosis risk after electrical injury.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Jose A Diaz; Wendy L Wahl
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in intensive care patients: an observational seroprevalence study.

Authors:  Robert L Levine; Georgene W Hergenroeder; John L Francis; Charles C Miller; Marcie J Hursting
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.300

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.