Literature DB >> 17210238

Estimating the uncertainty associated with Widmark's equation as commonly applied in forensic toxicology.

Rod G Gullberg1.   

Abstract

No computation is performed more frequently by forensic toxicologists than that involving Widmark's equation. The equation is employed to estimate either the number of drinks consumed or the corresponding blood or breath alcohol concentration. Despite the wide use of Widmark's equation, rarely is an uncertainty estimate also provided. Estimates from Widmark's equation involve at least seven uncertain random variables. Uncertainty estimates are presented that rely on methods of general error propagation compared to a method developed by Widmark. Assuming reasonable variable and uncertainty estimates, the error propagation method yielded for N=10.4 drinks, a combined uncertainty (standard deviation) of 1.3 drinks (CV=12.3%). Similarly, estimating the blood alcohol concentration yielded for 0.120 g/100 ml, an uncertainty of 0.0255 g/100 ml (CV=21.2%). Widmark's uncertainty method yielded 1.6 drinks (CV=15.4%). The derivation of Widmark's uncertainty estimate is also presented, showing that he considered only rho and beta to be uncertain. Widmark estimates for the number of drinks should include a 2CV estimate of approximately 25% while the blood alcohol concentration estimate should include a 2CV estimate of approximately 42%. Including valid estimates of uncertainty should enhance the legal admissibility and confidence for Widmark estimations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17210238     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between alcohol consumption and fatal motor vehicle injury: high risk at low alcohol levels.

Authors:  Benjamin Taylor; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  The more you drink, the harder you fall: a systematic review and meta-analysis of how acute alcohol consumption and injury or collision risk increase together.

Authors:  B Taylor; H M Irving; F Kanteres; R Room; G Borges; C Cherpitel; T Greenfield; J Rehm
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Estimated blood alcohol concentrations for child and adolescent drinking and their implications for screening instruments.

Authors:  John E Donovan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Experimental study of the temporal profile of breath alcohol concentration in a Chinese population after a light meal.

Authors:  Y C Li; N N Sze; S C Wong; K L Tsui; F L So
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Alcohol calculations and their uncertainty.

Authors:  John Searle
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.266

6.  The Quality and Accuracy of Mobile Apps to Prevent Driving After Drinking Alcohol.

Authors:  Hollie Wilson; Stoyan R Stoyanov; Shailen Gandabhai; Alexander Baldwin
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.773

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.