Literature DB >> 17209958

The acute effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during extracorporeal life support: an experimental study.

Loes D C Sauren1, Koen D Reesink, Jasper L Selder, Cesare Beghi, Frederik H van der Veen, Jos G Maessen.   

Abstract

Hemodynamically unstable patients supported by an extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuit often receive additional support by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, it is not established whether support of the failing heart is improved by adjunctive IABP in both peripheral cannulation (PC) and central cannulation (CC) settings. Seven sheep were supported by an IABP and an ECLS system which were cannulated centrally as well as peripherally. In each cannulation configuration, hemodynamic and cardiac function indices were measured at baseline, ECLS, and ECLS plus IABP. The primary variables were mean coronary artery flow (Qcor), diastolic pressure time index (DPTI), left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume area (PVA), and tension time index (TTI). Additional IABP with ECLS support (CC/PC) decreased LV afterload (LV systolic peak pressure -4%, P<0.05/-8%, P<0.02), as well as TTI -2%/-10% and PVA -10%/-12% (P<0.03). Coronary perfusion was increased by additional IABP: CC, Qcor, +9%, and DPTI, +18% (P<0.02); PC, Qcor,+6%, and DPTI, +11% (P<0.05). IABP augmented the myocardial oxygen supply/demand ratios (CC/PC): Qcor/(PVA.heart rate) (+21%/+22%, P<0.02) and DPTI/TTI (+27%/+24%, P<0.03). In case of low arterial pressure (<50 mm Hg) and reduced ECLS flow, the overall hemodynamic profile improved only with central cannulation. We conclude that in both central and peripheral ECLS cannulation settings, adjunctive IABP improves the myocardial oxygen supply demand balance. In case of low cardiac output and insufficient extracorporeal flow with PC, adjunctive IABP may be contraindicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17209958     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00337.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  9 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Marisa Cevasco; Hiroo Takayama; Masahiko Ando; Arthur R Garan; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Enzo Lüsebrink; Leonhard Binzenhöfer; Antonia Kellnar; Christoph Müller; Clemens Scherer; Benedikt Schrage; Dominik Joskowiak; Tobias Petzold; Daniel Braun; Stefan Brunner; Sven Peterss; Jörg Hausleiter; Sebastian Zimmer; Frank Born; Dirk Westermann; Holger Thiele; Andreas Schäfer; Christian Hagl; Steffen Massberg; Martin Orban
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.138

3.  Coronary versus carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in a pig model of prolonged cardiac arrest treated by different modes of venoarterial ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.

Authors:  Jan Bělohlávek; Mikuláš Mlček; Michal Huptych; Tomáš Svoboda; Stěpán Havránek; Petr Ošt'ádal; Tomáš Bouček; Tomáš Kovárník; František Mlejnský; Vratislav Mrázek; Marek Bělohlávek; Michael Aschermann; Aleš Linhart; Otomar Kittnar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Heart failure supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a systematic review of pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Silver Heinsar; Sacha Rozencwajg; Jacky Suen; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Maximilian Malfertheiner; Leen Vercaemst; Lars Mikael Broman; Matthieu Schmidt; Alain Combes; Indrek Rätsep; John F Fraser; Jonathan E Millar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-05-25

5.  Left Ventricle Unloading with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariusz Kowalewski; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Kamil Zieliński; Gennaro Martucci; Artur Słomka; Piotr Suwalski; Roberto Lorusso; Paolo Meani; Antonio Arcadipane; Michele Pilato; Giuseppe Maria Raffa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Anne Freund; Steffen Desch; Janine Pöss; Dmitry Sulimov; Marcus Sandri; Nicolas Majunke; Holger Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishi; Masanobu Ishii; Kenichi Tsujita; Hiroshi Okamoto; Satoshi Koto; Michikazu Nakai; Yoko Sumita; Yoshitaka Iwanaga; Satoaki Matoba; Yoshio Kobayashi; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Yutaka Hikichi; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yuji Ikari; Shiro Uemura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.106

8.  How much of the intraaortic balloon volume is displaced toward the coronary circulation?

Authors:  Christina Kolyva; George M Pantalos; John R Pepper; Ashraf W Khir
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Clinical impact of intra-aortic balloon pump during extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Taek Kyu Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Jin-Ho Choi; Kiick Sung; Young Tak Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.