Literature DB >> 17209794

A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: a 6-year follow-up.

Liran Levin1, Paul Sadet, Yoav Grossmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall survival rate and factors that affect the clinical outcome of 1,387 consecutively placed implant-supported single restorations up to 6 years.
METHODS: During 6 years (1999 to 2005), 1,387 implants were placed in 1,215 subjects (1,073 males and 142 females) who required single-tooth replacements. The average time from implant placement was 2.7 +/- 3.27 years. Implants were mostly placed in the maxillary premolar area (39.5%) followed by the anterior maxillary area (28.7%). Implant survival and location, need for bone augmentation, and implant dimensions were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Failed implants totaled 96, resulting in an overall survival rate of 93.1%. The vast majority of failures (94.8%) occurred during the first year following implant placement. Bone augmentation was performed in 9.7% of the implants with a 92.5% survival rate, similar to the survival rate of non-augmented areas (93.1%; P = 0.79). The average implant length was 13.3 mm, ranging from 8 to 16 mm. Longer implants (> or =11 mm) showed similar survival rates as implants <11 mm (93.2% versus 90.2%, respectively; P = 0.4). Implant width ranged between 3.25 to 5 mm (mean 3.9), with no effect on implant survival (P = 0.43). There was a significant difference in implant survival according to the anatomic zone of implant placement (P = 0.0075). The maxillary premolar area showed the highest survival rate (96.2%).
CONCLUSION: Implant-supported single-tooth replacement is a predictable procedure with good survival rates up to 6 years.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209794     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of implants and restorations placed in general dental practices: a retrospective study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.

Authors:  John D Da Silva; Julie Kazimiroff; Athena Papas; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson; Donald A Vena; Hongyu Wu; Damon Collie; Ronald G Craig
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Implant supported prosthesis in a patient with progeria: case report.

Authors:  Gözlem Ceylan; Nergiz Yilmaz; Ozgün Senyurt; Göknil Ergün Kunt
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  High glucose inhibits osteogenic differentiation through the BMP signaling pathway in bone mesenchymal stem cells in mice.

Authors:  Juncheng Wang; Bin Wang; Ying Li; Dongsheng Wang; E Lingling; Yang Bai; Hongchen Liu
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.068

4.  Subjective and qualitative assessment of neural disturbance after inferior alveolar nerve transposition for dental implant placement.

Authors:  Fumihiro Nishimaki; Hiroshi Kurita; Shinya Tozawa; Yuji Teramoto; Rishiho Nishizawa; Shin-Ichi Yamada
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-05-14

Review 5.  The impact of the alveolar bone sites on early implant failure: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atef Abdel Hameed Fouda
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice toward Impression Technique and Materials for Recording Impression in Implant Placement among Dental Practitioners in Patna City, Bihar.

Authors:  Ujjal Chatterjee; Ashish Srivastava; Abhinav Singh; Ankur Aggarwal; Chetan Jagdish; Akshat Sharma
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-10-08

7.  Satisfaction analysis of patients with single implant treatments based on a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Heng Dong; Na Zhou; Hui Liu; Haohao Huang; Guangwen Yang; Li Chen; Meng Ding; Yongbin Mou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Assessment of demographic and clinical data related to dental implants in a group of Turkish patients treated at a university clinic.

Authors:  Canan Bural; Hakan Bilhan; Altuğ Cilingir; Onur Geçkili
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 9.  Dental implant survival in diabetic patients; review and recommendations.

Authors:  Rajendra Kumar Dubey; Deepesh Kumar Gupta; Amit Kumar Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 10.  Dealing with dental implant failures.

Authors:  Liran Levin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.