Literature DB >> 17209117

Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.

N Karssemeijer1, J D M Otten, H Rijken, R Holland.   

Abstract

Performance of a computer aided detection (CAD) system for masses in mammograms was investigated. Using data collected in an observer study, in which experienced screening radiologists read a series of 500 screening mammograms without CAD, performance of radiologists was compared to the standalone performance of the CAD system. Due to a larger number of FPs (false positives), the performance of CAD was lower than that of the readers. However, when analysis was restricted to mammographic regions identified by the radiologists, it was found that the CAD system was comparable to the readers in discriminating these regions in cancer and non-cancer. In a retrospective analysis, the effect of independent combination of reader scores with CAD was compared to independent combination of scores of two radiologists. No significant difference was found between the results of these two methods. Both methods improved single reading results significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209117     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/37622515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  4 in total

1.  Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.

Authors:  Maurice Samulski; Rianne Hupse; Carla Boetes; Roel D M Mus; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of CAD on radiologists' detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Philip N Cascade; Ella A Kazerooni; Aamer R Chughtai; Chad Poopat; Thomas Song; Luba Frank; Jadranka Stojanovska; Anil Attili
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Ahmed Hosny; Matthew B Schabath; Maryellen L Giger; Nicolai J Birkbak; Alireza Mehrtash; Tavis Allison; Omar Arnaout; Christopher Abbosh; Ian F Dunn; Raymond H Mak; Rulla M Tamimi; Clare M Tempany; Charles Swanton; Udo Hoffmann; Lawrence H Schwartz; Robert J Gillies; Raymond Y Huang; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Caroline Rm Boggis; Magnus A McGee; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Maureen Gc Gillan; Mary Wilson; Anil K Jain; Nicola Barr; Ursula M Beetles; Miriam A Griffiths; Jill Johnson; Rita M Roberts; Heather E Deans; Karen A Duncan; Geeta Iyengar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.