Literature DB >> 17208958

Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening.

Mireille Faurobert1, Christina Mihr, Nadia Bertin, Tomasz Pawlowski, Luc Negroni, Nicolas Sommerer, Mathilde Causse.   

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model plant for studying fleshy fruit development. Several genetic and molecular approaches have been developed to increase our knowledge about the physiological basis of fruit growth, but very few data are yet available at the proteomic level. The main stages of fruit development were first determined through the dynamics of fruit diameter and pericarp cell number. Then, total proteins were extracted from pericarp tissue at six relevant developmental stages and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Protein patterns were markedly different between stages. Proteins showing major variations were monitored. We identified 90 of 1,791 well-resolved spots either by matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time-of-flight peptide mass fingerprinting or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry sequencing and expressed sequence tag database searching. Clustered correlation analysis results pointed out groups of proteins with similar expression profiles during fruit development. In young fruit, spots linked to amino acid metabolism or protein synthesis were mainly expressed during the cell division stage and down-regulated later. Some spots linked to cell division processes could be identified. During the cell expansion phase, spots linked to photosynthesis and proteins linked to cell wall formation transiently increased. In contrast, the major part of the spots related to C compounds and carbohydrate metabolism or oxidative processes were up-regulated during fruit development, showing an increase in spot intensity during development and maximal abundance in mature fruit. This was also the case for spots linked to stress responses and fruit senescence. We discuss protein variations, taking into account their potential role during fruit growth and comparing our results with already known variations at mRNA and metabolite-profiling levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208958      PMCID: PMC1820912          DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.092817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  82 in total

1.  Are isocitrate dehydrogenases and 2-oxoglutarate involved in the regulation of glutamate synthesis?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Cytosolic heat-stress proteins Hsp17.7 class I and Hsp17.3 class II of tomato act as molecular chaperones in vivo.

Authors:  D Löw; K Brändle; L Nover; C Forreiter
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Rutger Van der Hoeven; Catherine Ronning; James Giovannoni; Gregory Martin; Steven Tanksley
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Developing pineapple fruit has a small transcriptome dominated by metallothionein.

Authors:  Richard Moyle; David J Fairbairn; Jonni Ripi; Mark Crowe; Jose R Botella
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 5.  Arabidopsis thaliana proteomics: from proteome to genome.

Authors:  Sacha Baginsky; Wilhelm Gruissem
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth.

Authors:  Catherine Cheniclet; Wen Ying Rong; Mathilde Causse; Nathalie Frangne; Laurence Bolling; Jean-Pierre Carde; Jean-Pierre Renaudin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Molecular and biochemical characterization of the involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase A during the early development of tomato fruit.

Authors:  J Joubès; T H Phan; D Just; C Rothan; C Bergounioux; P Raymond; C Chevalier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  A novel small heat shock protein gene, vis1, contributes to pectin depolymerization and juice viscosity in tomato fruit.

Authors:  Wusirika Ramakrishna; Zhiping Deng; Chang-Kui Ding; Avtar K Handa; Richard H Ozminkowski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Ethylene-regulated gene expression in tomato fruit: characterization of novel ethylene-responsive and ripening-related genes isolated by differential display

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  A critical evaluation of sample extraction techniques for enhanced proteomic analysis of recalcitrant plant tissues.

Authors:  Ramu S Saravanan; Jocelyn K C Rose
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  68 in total

1.  ORTom: a multi-species approach based on conserved co-expression to identify putative functional relationships among genes in tomato.

Authors:  Laura Miozzi; Paolo Provero; Gian Paolo Accotto
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Protective proteins are differentially expressed in tomato genotypes differing for their tolerance to low-temperature storage.

Authors:  D Page; B Gouble; B Valot; J P Bouchet; C Callot; A Kretzschmar; M Causse; C M C G Renard; M Faurobert
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Enzyme activity profiles during fruit development in tomato cultivars and Solanum pennellii.

Authors:  Marie-Caroline Steinhauser; Dirk Steinhauser; Karin Koehl; Fernando Carrari; Yves Gibon; Alisdair R Fernie; Mark Stitt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Using metabolomics to estimate unintended effects in transgenic crop plants: problems, promises, and opportunities.

Authors:  Owen A Hoekenga
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2008-07

5.  Universal sample preparation method integrating trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation with phenol extraction for crop proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wu; Erhui Xiong; Wei Wang; Monica Scali; Mauro Cresti
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  A developmentally regulated lipocalin-like gene is overexpressed in Tomato yellow leaf curl virus-resistant tomato plants upon virus inoculation, and its silencing abolishes resistance.

Authors:  Dagan Sade; Assaf Eybishtz; Rena Gorovits; Iris Sobol; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Proteomic analysis of chloroplast-to-chromoplast transition in tomato reveals metabolic shifts coupled with disrupted thylakoid biogenesis machinery and elevated energy-production components.

Authors:  Cristina Barsan; Mohamed Zouine; Elie Maza; Wanping Bian; Isabel Egea; Michel Rossignol; David Bouyssie; Carole Pichereaux; Eduardo Purgatto; Mondher Bouzayen; Alain Latché; Jean-Claude Pech
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Proteomic analysis of pollination-induced corolla senescence in petunia.

Authors:  Shuangyi Bai; Belinda Willard; Laura J Chapin; Michael T Kinter; David M Francis; Anthony D Stead; Michelle L Jones
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Transcriptomic analysis of tomato carpel development reveals alterations in ethylene and gibberellin synthesis during pat3/pat4 parthenocarpic fruit set.

Authors:  Laura Pascual; Jose M Blanca; Joaquin Cañizares; Fernado Nuez
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Proteomic analysis of peach fruit mesocarp softening and chilling injury using difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE).

Authors:  Ricardo Nilo; Carlos Saffie; Kathryn Lilley; Ricardo Baeza-Yates; Verónica Cambiazo; Reinaldo Campos-Vargas; Mauricio González; Lee A Meisel; Julio Retamales; Herman Silva; Ariel Orellana
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.