Literature DB >> 17208924

Dignity and the challenge of dying in nursing homes: the residents' view.

Sabine Pleschberger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: human dignity is discussed in almost all public debates on the care of the dying, as well as in international policies for health and social care of older people. Because nursing homes are gaining importance as places where residents live out their lives in modern western societies and since there is evidence that end-of-life care in nursing homes lacks quality, there is a growing discussion on introducing improved end-of-life care in these institutions. In order to accomplish this, the view of those who are most affected is of utmost importance.
OBJECTIVE: to explore the meaning of dignity with regard to end-of-life issues from the perspective of older nursing home residents in western Germany.
METHODS: this qualitative study is based on the Grounded Theory Approach, and the design included three steps of data generation; narrative interviews with residents of nursing homes constitute the main data pool (n = 20) of the results presented in this paper. Theoretical sampling was aimed at maximising the variety of organisational as well as residents' characteristics. Analysis of the transcripts was supported by Atlas/ti program and followed several different coding procedures and aimed at generating a concept of dignity.
RESULTS: dignity was differentiated into intrapersonal dignity and relational dignity, socially constructed by the act of recognition. Social relations and encounters are a prerequisite for relational dignity, which underlines the vulnerability of nursing home residents' who increasingly lack social networks. A broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviour, which aimed at recognising dignity, was bundled under the category 'not being a burden'. In this light, dignity was challenged most by the threat of illness and having care needs. This was fostered by the perception of insufficient care in the nursing homes. In the light of this concept, death with dignity meant 'death at the right time', though the residents in the sample did not want to comment on the time of death, other than aspects like (i) being active to the very last, (ii) respecting one's will and being allowed to die, (iii) not being in pain, (iv) being amongst persons close to one (valediction and showing respect).
CONCLUSION: the study emphasizes the high vulnerability of nursing home residents with regard to dignity. They place their dignity under the constraints of the need for help and care into question. This appears alarming, if one does not manage to, with the help of different ethics, obtain a new perspective on these phases of life. It is evident that the understanding of dignity is not solely individualistic and personal, but rather has a close relationship to social ideas of value, which ultimately influence the basic requirements of institutions in which 'frail old people' live.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208924     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  26 in total

1.  Health and welfare of older people in care homes.

Authors:  Marion E T McMurdo; Miles D Witham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-05

2.  Qualitative study on perceived dignity of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China.

Authors:  Jinnan Xiao; Ka Ming Chow; Carmen Wh Chan; Minjie Li; Ying Deng
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity.

Authors:  Keith Zi Yuan Chua; Elaine Li Ying Quah; Yun Xue Lim; Chloe Keyi Goh; Jieyu Lim; Darius Wei Jun Wan; Simone Meiqi Ong; Chi Sum Chong; Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo; Laura Shih Hui Goh; Ray Meng See; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Yun Ting Ong; Min Chiam; Eng Koon Ong; Jamie Xuelian Zhou; Crystal Lim; Simon Yew Kuang Ong; Lalit Krishna
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.113

4.  Understanding the meaning of human dignity in Korea: a content analysis.

Authors:  Kae-Hwa Jo; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2009-04

5.  Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer.

Authors:  R Philipp; A Mehnert; C Lehmann; K Oechsle; C Bokemeyer; A Krüll; S Vehling
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Challenges to conducting research with older people living in nursing homes.

Authors:  Sue Hall; Susan Longhurst; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Older patients' attitudes towards and experiences of patient-physician end-of-life communication: a secondary analysis of interviews from British, Dutch and Belgian patients.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; H Roeline W Pasman; Sheila A Payne; Jane Seymour; Sabine Pleschberger; Reginald Deschepper; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Cardiovascular medicine at face value: a qualitative pilot study on clinical axiology.

Authors:  Adalberto de Hoyos; Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado; Jorge Mendez; Sergio Ricco; Ana Serrano; Carmen Flores Cisneros; Carlos Macías-Ojeda; Héctor Cisneros; David Bialostozky; Nelly Altamirano-Bustamante; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.464

9.  Changes in the personal dignity of nursing home residents: a longitudinal qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Mariska G Oosterveld-Vlug; H Roeline W Pasman; Isis E van Gennip; Dick L Willems; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing the validity and intra-observer agreement of the MIDAM-LTC; an instrument measuring factors that influence personal dignity in long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Mariska G Oosterveld-Vlug; H Roeline W Pasman; Isis E van Gennip; Henrica C W de Vet; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.