Literature DB >> 17208538

Evolution of the technique in the transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: effect on outcome.

Ahmed Nasr1, Jacob C Langer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transanal pull-through has become the standard operation for Hirschsprung's disease in many pediatric surgical centers. Over the past 8 years, we have modified our technique by leaving a short-rather than a long-rectal cuff and by doing routine intraabdominal colonic biopsies through an umbilical incision before beginning the anal dissection. The aim of this study was to determine if these modifications have changed the outcome for children undergoing this operation.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent transanal pull-through by a single surgeon between 1997 and 2005 was conducted.
RESULTS: There were 23 children who had a long cuff (10-15 cm) and 22 who had a short cuff (<2 cm). The short cuff group tended to be younger (25 +/- 23 vs 139 +/- 67 days; P < .05) and smaller (3.5 +/- 0.7 vs 6.0 +/- 2.7 kg; P < .05) at the time of surgery. The operating time was shorter (167 vs 186 minutes; P = .05) in the short cuff group. Outcomes were improved in the short cuff group, as evidenced by decreased hospital stay (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.7 +/- 0.9; P < .05), decreased incidence of enterocolitis (9% vs 30%; P = .1), and lower incidence of narrowing requiring daily dilatations (5% vs 30%; P < .05). Preliminary colonic biopsy was performed on 18 of the 45 patients. This had no significant effect on narcotic use (66% vs 70%; P = .8) and did not increase operating time (174 +/- 31 vs 179 +/- 34 minutes; P = .6). Hospital stay was shorter in the umbilical biopsy group (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.6 +/- 0.9 days; P = .006).
CONCLUSION: Results of the transanal pull-through have improved likely as a result of a combination of experience and use of a shorter rectal muscular cuff. The use of a preliminary colonic biopsy through an umbilical incision has not increased postoperative pain, prolonged operative time, or lengthened hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208538     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of the postoperative bowel function between transanal endorectal pull-through and transabdominal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a study of the feces excretion function using an RI-defecogram.

Authors:  Miyuki Kohno; Hiromichi Ikawa; Kunio Konuma; Hiroaki Masuyama; Hironori Fukumoto; Eri Ogawa; Takahiro Oshikiri; Sadayoshi Takahashi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease using long cuff dissection and short V-shaped partially resected cuff anastomosis: early and late outcomes.

Authors:  Li Yang; Shao-Tao Tang; Guo-Qing Cao; Ying Yang; Shuai Li; Shi-Wang Li; Yong Wang; Yong-Zhong Mao; Qing-Lan Ruan; Guo-Bin Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: experience with 50 patients.

Authors:  Ü Adıgüzel; K Ağengin; I Kırıştıoğlu; H Doğruyol
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Hirschsprung's disease in the laparoscopic transanal pull-through era: implications of age at surgery and technical aspects.

Authors:  Go Miyano; Masahiro Takeda; Hiroyuki Koga; Manabu Okawada; Nana Nakazawa-Tanaka; Junya Ishii; Takashi Doi; Geoffrey J Lane; Tadaharu Okazaki; Masahiko Urao; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Bowel function and fecal continence after Soave's trans-anal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a local experience.

Authors:  Ossama M Zakaria
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-03-06

6.  Outcome of transanal endorectal vs. transabdominal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung's disease.

Authors:  Philipp Romero; Michaela Kroiss; Martin Chmelnik; Ingo Königs; Lucas M Wessel; Stefan Holland-Cunz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Is the Rehbein procedure obsolete in the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease?

Authors:  Reina Visser; Teun J van de Ven; Iris A L M van Rooij; Rene M H Wijnen; Ivo de Blaauw
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Comparative review of functional outcomes post surgery for Hirschsprung's disease utilizing the paediatric incontinence and constipation scoring system.

Authors:  Olugbenga Michael Aworanti; Dermot Thomas Mcdowell; Ian Michael Martin; Judy Hung; Feargal Quinn
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  A novel corrective pullthrough surgery in a mouse model of Hirschsprung's disease.

Authors:  Lifu Zhao; Zhi Cheng; Deepti Dhall; Terence M Doherty; Philip K Frykman
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: Comparison between partial and near total laparoscopic mobilization of rectum.

Authors:  Mohit Kumar Mathur; Satish Kumar Aggarwal; Simmi K Ratan; Shandip Kumar Sinha
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.