Literature DB >> 17208108

Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.

Xingzhong Zhang1, Mark G Hans, Greg Graham, H Lester Kirchner, Susan Redline.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare craniofacial measurements from cephalometric radiographs with analogous measurements from standardized facial photographs.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 326 subjects (168 white, 158 black) enrolled in a genetic epidemiological family study of sleep behavior. Traditional lateral cephalograms and standardized facial photographs were taken of each subject. Three angular, 3 linear, total face height, and lower face height cephalometric measurements were compared with 4 angular and 4 linear measurements from standardized photographs. Descriptive statistics for all measurements in the entire sample and for the racial subgroups were computed. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were computed between analogous measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from repeated measurements on the photographs.
RESULTS: The reliability of the photographic technique was excellent, with all measurements having intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.90. However, the correlations between analogous photographic and cephalometric measurements were lower and varied between 0.356 and 0.643. The highest correlations were observed for lower facial height and mandibular length, 0.643 and 0.562, respectively. In the black group, the correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of mandibular length and lower facial height were 0.676 and 0.690, respectively. Both were higher than those for white subjects, 0.399 and 0.577, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both linear and angular measurements useful for characterizing facial morphology can be reliably measured from facial photographs. However, only moderate correlations with analogous cephalometric measures were found. Therefore, standardized photographs and cephalograms most likely measure different aspects of facial morphology and cannot be used interchangeably. Cephalometrics remains the method of choice for clinical patient care, whereas photographs might be better for large-scale epidemiological studies, especially if there is a need for a low-cost, noninvasive method that be used in diverse clinical and field settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208108     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.

Authors:  Atalia Wasserstein; Nir Shpack; Yossi Ben Yoseph; Silvia Geron; Moshe Davidovitch; Alexander Vardimon
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pooja Mehta; Roshan M Sagarkar; Silju Mathew
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Facial phenotyping by quantitative photography reflects craniofacial morphology measured on magnetic resonance imaging in Icelandic sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Richard J Schwab; Greg Maislin; Richard W W Lee; Bryndis Benedikstdsottir; Allan I Pack; Thorarinn Gislason; Sigurdur Juliusson; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review.

Authors:  Duygu Koc; Arife Dogan; Bulent Bek
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-04

5.  Effect of Sagittal Dentoskeletal Discrepancies on the Vermilion Height and Lip Area.

Authors:  Arun Joseph; Shobha Sundareswaran; Sandhya Srinivas
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

6.  Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs with radiographs and anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  Gunjan Negi; Prasad Chitra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-06-19

7.  Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.

Authors:  Muge Aksu; Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Liliane de Carvalho Rosas Gomes; Karla Orfelina Carpio Horta; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini; Marcelo Gonçalves; João Roberto Gonçalves
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Measuring the reliability of sagittal facial anthropometric measurements under soft tissue displacement using a modified ruler.

Authors:  Faramarz Mojtahedzadeh; Saeed Alizadeh; Bahareh Riazi; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

10.  Evolution of photography in maxillofacial surgery: from analog to 3D photography - an overview.

Authors:  Heidrun Schaaf; Christoph Yves Malik; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Philipp Streckbein
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.