Literature DB >> 17208100

Orthodontic treatment experience and prevalence of malocclusion traits in an Icelandic adult population.

Teitur Jonsson1, Sigurjon Arnlaugsson, Karl Orn Karlsson, Bjorn Ragnarsson, Eirikur Orn Arnarson, Thordur Eydal Magnusson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to record the extent of orthodontic treatment and the prevalence of occlusal anomalies in an adult sample in Iceland.
METHODS: The study was based on a random sample of 829 subjects, 342 men and 487 women, aged 31 to 44 years, who completed questionnaires about their orthodontic treatment experiences and were available for clinical examination.
RESULTS: Complete dentitions in both jaws were present in 52.8% of the women and 45.3% of the men at the examinations. Significantly higher percentages of the women had received orthodontic treatment of some kind (24.3% compared with 16.9% for the men) and treatment with fixed appliances (16.0% compared with 9.5% for the men). Malocclusion traits were recorded with a standardized method, describing sagittal and vertical incisor relationships, sagittal and transverse molar relationships, and mandibular and maxillary space conditions. The results showed that 45.5% of the subjects had no malocclusions, 33.9% had 1 malocclusion trait, and 20.5% had 2 to 4 traits. The most frequent malocclusion traits were distal molar occlusion (27.7%), mandibular anterior crowding (13.4%), molar crossbite (11.9%), excessive overbite (11.8%), maxillary anterior crowding (7.1%), mesial molar occlusion (6.9%), and excessive overjet (5.3%). The prevalences of mandibular overjet, mesial occlusion, and scissors-bite were significantly higher in the men than in the women.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalences of malocclusion traits were similar in treated and untreated subjects, except for a significantly lower prevalence of overjet and a higher prevalence of molar crossbite in the treated group. Comparison with other studies showed low prevalences of overjet, overbite, open bite, and maxillary and mandibular spacing and crowding; other variables fell within the ranges of prevalence in previous surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208100     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Impact of social and economic characteristics on orthodontic treatment among children and teenagers in France.

Authors:  A Germa; M Kaminski; C Nabet
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.383

2.  Stability of deep-bite correction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Greg J Huang; Steven B Bates; Ambre A Ehlert; Dean P Whiting; Stephanie S-H Chen; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  J World Fed Orthod       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics.

Authors:  Mon Mon Tin-Oo; Norkhafizah Saddki; Nurhidayati Hassan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Retention period after treatment of posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Garcia Costa; Thaís Magalhães Galindo; Claudia Trindade Mattos; Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of jaw muscle activity and mandibular kinematics in young patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Teuscher activator.

Authors:  Maria-José Cuevas; Alberto Cacho; Jose-Antonio Alarcón; Conchita Martín
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01

6.  Prevalence of Malocclusion among Male School Children in Riyadh City.

Authors:  Fahad M Albakri; Navin Ingle; Mansour K Assery
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.