Literature DB >> 17208082

Self-managed long-term low-molecular-weight heparin therapy: the balance of benefits and harms.

Russell D Hull1, Graham F Pineo, Rollin F Brant, Andrew F Mah, Natasha Burke, Richard Dear, Turnly Wong, Roy Cook, Susan Solymoss, Man-Chiu Poon, Gary Raskob.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A substantial clinical need exists for an alternate to vitamin K antagonists for treating deep vein thrombosis in many patients. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), body-weight adjusted, avoids anticoagulant monitoring and may be associated with less bleeding. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of long-term LMWH compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy in a broad spectrum of patients with proximal vein thrombosis.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial using objective outcome measures comparing therapy for 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Of 737 patients, 18 of 369 receiving tinzaparin (4.9%) had recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months compared with 21 of 368 (5.7%) receiving usual care (absolute difference, -0.8%, 95% confidence interval -4.1-2.4). Hemorrhagic complications occurred less frequently in the LMWH group largely because of less minor bleeding: 48 of 369 patients (13.0%) versus 73 of 368 patients (19.8%) receiving usual-care anticoagulation (absolute difference -6.8%; P = .011; risk ratio = 0.66). New major bleeding events ceased early (by day 23, P = .034) for patients receiving LMWH but persisted throughout the study treatment interval for patients receiving vitamin K antagonist therapy. No mortality advantage was shown for LMWH.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that LMWH is similar in effectiveness to the usual-care vitamin K antagonist treatment for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism in a broad spectrum of patients. It causes less harm and enhances the clinicians' therapeutic options for patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Our findings reported here suggest the possibility of a broader role for long-term LMWH in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208082     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  16 in total

1.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Essay for the CIHR/CMAJ award: the role of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Russell Hull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Vitamin K antagonists versus low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Alina Andras; Adriano Sala Tenna; Marlene Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-24

Review 5.  Effects of Long-Term Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Fractures and Bone Density in Non-Pregnant Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Olga Gajic-Veljanoski; Chai W Phua; Prakesh S Shah; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and in the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Lesley J Scott; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 2: treatment.

Authors:  Josien van Es; Renée A Douma; Victor E A Gerdes; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Validation of the clinical prediction rule for recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: the Ottawa score.

Authors:  Shin Ahn; Kyung Soo Lim; Yoon-Seon Lee; Jae-Lyun Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of anticoagulants.

Authors:  Florian Posch; Oliver Königsbrügge; Christoph Zielinski; Ingrid Pabinger; Cihan Ay
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  Use of Factor V Leiden genetic testing in practice and impact on management.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laberge; Bruce M Psaty; Lucia A Hindorff; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.