Literature DB >> 17207886

Conditional reimbursement within the Dutch drug policy.

Maartje Niezen1, Antoinette de Bont, Elly Stolk, Arthur Eyck, Louis Niessen, Herman Stoevelaar.   

Abstract

In The Netherlands, conditional reimbursement is considered to be a promising approach to achieving more effective and efficient pharmaceutical care. Because of its formal status and nationwide regulation, conditional reimbursement may allow governments to better control medical decision-making. To evaluate the effects of conditional reimbursement on medicine use and its performance as a policy tool, we compared observed volumes of medicine use with expected volumes. In addition, we mapped the annual growth by analysing trends in the volumes of use of all conditionally reimbursed drugs; starting with the year the drug entered the market (using macro-level data). Next we explored five cases in depth (using micro-level data) in order to explore what fraction of individual prescriptions met the requirements. We also performed qualitative research (document analysis, interviews (N=65)) in order to obtain the stakeholders' perspectives on how the measure functions, as well as to interpret the case studies data further. The findings suggest that conditional reimbursement may be an effective policy instrument, but that several changes are needed to optimize its impact. These changes are predominantly related to transparency (e.g. conditions are set following clear procedures and criteria), legitimacy (conditions should be consistent with criteria for prioritization), feasibility of procedures to control appropriate use, and timely and appropriate commitment of the stakeholders.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207886     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

Review 1.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  A National Approach to Reimbursement Decision-Making on Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada? Insights from Across the Ponds.

Authors:  Hilary Short; Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-05

5.  Pediatric Outpatient Prescriptions in Countries With Advanced Economies in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marion Taine; Lucile Offredo; Alain Weill; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik; Martin Chalumeau
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Databases as policy instruments. About extending networks as evidence-based policy.

Authors:  Antoinette de Bont; Herman Stoevelaar; Roland Bal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Trends in annual drug expenditure - a 16 year perspective of a public healthcare maintenance organization.

Authors:  Yossef Lomnicky; Daniel Kurnik; Ronen Loebstein; Itzhak Katzir; Janet Vesterman-Landes; Nava Siegelmann-Danieli
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.