Literature DB >> 17207834

Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.

Heleen De Wever1, Stefan Weiss, Thorsten Reemtsma, Johan Vereecken, Jutta Müller, Thomas Knepper, Ocke Rörden, Susana Gonzalez, Damia Barcelo, Maria Dolores Hernando.   

Abstract

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) were compared with conventional activated sludge systems (CAS) for micropollutant degradation, in laboratory-scale spiking experiments with synthetic and real domestic wastewater. The target micropollutants were polar in nature and represented a broad range in biodegradability. The experimental data indicated that MBR treatment could significantly enhance removal of the micropollutants 1,6- and 2,7-naphthalene disulfonate (NDSA) and benzothiazole-2-sulfonate. 1,5-NDSA, EDTA and diclofenac were not removed in either the MBR or the CAS. The other compounds were equally well degraded in both systems. For 1,3-naphthalene disulfonate, the existence of a minimum threshold level for degradation could be demonstrated. Although MBRs could not always make a difference in the overall removal efficiencies achieved, they showed reduced lag phases for degradation and a stronger memory effect, which implies that they may respond quicker to variable influent concentrations. Finally, micropollutant removal also turned out to be less sensitive to system operational variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207834     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Characterization and comparison of bacterial communities selected in conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor pilot plants: a focus on Nitrospira and Planctomycetes bacterial phyla.

Authors:  Carolina Chiellini; Giulio Munz; Giulio Petroni; Claudio Lubello; Gualtiero Mori; Franco Verni; Claudia Vannini
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Biofiltration vs conventional activated sludge plants: what about priority and emerging pollutants removal?

Authors:  R Mailler; J Gasperi; V Rocher; S Gilbert-Pawlik; D Geara-Matta; R Moilleron; G Chebbo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Benzothiazole heterogeneous photodegradation in nano α-Fe2O3/oxalate system under UV light irradiation.

Authors:  Xiangyun Han; Xi Zhang; Lei Zhang; Mei Pan; Jinlong Yan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Removal of the 2-mercaptobenotiazole from model wastewater by ozonation.

Authors:  Jan Derco; Angelika Kassai; Michal Melicher; Jozef Dudas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.