Literature DB >> 17207804

Quantitative determination of wine highly volatile sulfur compounds by using automated headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection. Critical study and optimization of a new procedure.

Ricardo López1, Ana Cristina Lapeña, Juan Cacho, Vicente Ferreira.   

Abstract

The quantitative determination of wine volatile sulfur compounds by automated headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with a carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS) fiber and subsequent gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD) has been evaluated. The direct extraction of the sulfur compounds in 5 ml of wine has been found to suffer from matrix effects and short linear ranges, problems which could not be solved by the use of different internal standards or by multiple headspace SPME. These problems were attributed to saturation of the fiber and to competitive effects between analytes, internal standards and other wine volatiles. Another problem was the oxidation of analytes during the procedure. The reduction in sample volume by a factor 50 (0.1 ml diluted with water or brine) brought about a reduction in the amount of sulfur compounds taken in the fiber by a factor just 3.3. Consequently, a new procedure has been proposed. In a sealed vial containing 4.9 ml of saturated NaCl brine, the air is thoroughly displaced with nitrogen, and the wine (0.1 ml) and the internal standards (0.02 ml) are further introduced with a syringe through the vial septum. This sample is extracted at 35 degrees C for 20 min. This procedure makes a satisfactory determination possible of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, diethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide. The linear dynamic ranges cover the normal ranges of occurrence of these analytes in wine with typical r2 between 0.9823 and 0.9980. Reproducibility in real samples ranges from 10 to 20% and repeatability is better than 10% in most cases. The method accuracy is satisfactory, with errors below 20% for hydrogen sulfide and mostly below 10% for the other compounds. The proposed method has been applied to the analysis of 34 Spanish wines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17207804     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  4 in total

1.  Screening for volatile sulphur compounds in a fatal accident case.

Authors:  Ping Xiang; Huosheng Qiang; Baohua Shen; Min Shen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2017-06-07

2.  Effect of Wine Matrix Composition on the Quantification of Volatile Sulfur Compounds by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Pulsed Flame Photometric Detection.

Authors:  Peter M Davis; Michael C Qian
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Development of the Method for Determination of Volatile Sulfur Compounds (VSCs) in Fruit Brandy with the Use of HS-SPME/GC-MS.

Authors:  Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak; Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska; Piotr Patelski; Maria Balcerek
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  How to modulate the formation of negative volatile sulfur compounds during wine fermentation?

Authors:  Rafael Jimenez-Lorenzo; Audrey Bloem; Vincent Farines; Jean-Marie Sablayrolles; Carole Camarasa
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.