Literature DB >> 17207609

Caspofungin for the treatment of fungal infections: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Matthew E Falagas1, Fotinie Ntziora, Gregoria I Betsi, George Samonis.   

Abstract

During the last decade, owing to the low effectiveness and high toxicity of older antifungals, new antifungal agents have been released to the market for the treatment of patients with fungal infections. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of caspofungin in comparison with other antifungal agents. This review was conducted to examine further the role of caspofungin in the treatment of patients with fungal, mainly Candida, infections. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search, study selection and data extraction from relevant RCTs. A total of six RCTs comparing caspofungin with amphotericin B (deoxycholate in four and liposomal in one RCT) or fluconazole (in one RCT), which studied a total of 1974 patients, were included in our review. Success of the applied treatment in the clinically evaluable patients was achieved in 496/943 (52.6%) of the caspofungin-treated patients and in 381/852 (44.7%) of the amphotericin B- and lipid amphotericin B-treated patients. Discontinuation due to drug toxicity was significantly less common in patients receiving caspofungin than amphotericin B (odds ratio (OR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.85, random effects model). Development of nephrotoxicity, hypokalaemia and fever also occurred significantly less often with caspofungin than amphotericin B (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.36, fixed effects model; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.12-0.76, random effects model; and OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, random effects model, respectively). No difference in mortality was noted. Caspofungin was associated with better clinical outcomes (higher cure and fewer adverse effects) than amphotericin B in the treatment of patients with fungal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207609     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  7 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.

Authors:  Linda Clerihew; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Drug-induced endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  Chaker Ben Salem; Raoudha Slim; Bouraoui Elouni; Houssem Hmouda; Kamel Bouraoui
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection.

Authors:  Jiun-Ling Wang; Chia-Hsuin Chang; Yinong Young-Xu; K Arnold Chan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Invasive candidiasis in pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Sunit Singhi; Akash Deep
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  continuous versus conventional infusion of amphotericin B deoxycholate: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Giannoula S Tansarli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Yuanming Xing; Lu Chen; Yan Feng; Yan Zhou; Yajing Zhai; Jun Lu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  Human monoclonal antibody-based therapy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  Francesca Bugli; Margherita Cacaci; Cecilia Martini; Riccardo Torelli; Brunella Posteraro; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Francesco Paroni Sterbini
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-06-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.