Literature DB >> 17207103

Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes.

Keith Humphreys1, Rudolf H Moos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that addiction and psychiatric treatment programs that actively promote self-help group involvement can reduce their patients' health care costs in the first year after treatment, but such initially impressive effects may wane over time. This paper examines whether the positive clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs evident 1 year after treatment among substance-dependent patients who were strongly encouraged to attend 12-step self-help groups were sustained at 2-year follow-up.
METHODS: A 2-year quasi-experimental analysis of matched samples of male substance-dependent patients who were treated in either 12-step-based (n=887 patients) or cognitive-behavioral (CB, n=887 patients) treatment programs. The 12-step-based programs placed substantially more emphasis on 12-step concepts, had more staff members "in recovery," had a more spiritually oriented treatment environment, and promoted self-help group involvement much more extensively than did the CB programs. The 2-year follow-up assessed patients' substance use, psychiatric functioning, self-help group affiliation, and mental health care utilization and costs.
RESULTS: As had been the case in the 1-year follow-up of this sample, the only difference in clinical outcomes was a substantially higher abstinence rate among patients treated in 12-step (49.5%) versus CB (37.0%) programs. Twelve-step treatment patients had 50 to 100% higher scores on indices of 12-step self-help group involvement than did patients from CB programs. In contrast, patients from CB programs relied significantly more on outpatient and inpatient mental health services, leading to 30% lower costs in the 12-step treatment programs. This was smaller than the difference in cost identified at 1 year, but still significant ($2,440 per patient, p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Promoting self-help group involvement appears to improve posttreatment outcomes while reducing the costs of continuing care. Even cost offsets that somewhat diminish over the long term can yield substantial savings. Actively promoting self-help group involvement may therefore be a useful clinical practice for helping addicted patients recover in a time of constrained fiscal resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207103     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  47 in total

1.  Influence of religiosity on 12-step participation and treatment response among substance-dependent adolescents.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Maria E Pagano; Robert L Stout; Shannon M Johnson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Onset and course of alcoholism over 25 years in middle class men.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The role of Alcoholics Anonymous in mobilizing adaptive social network changes: a prospective lagged mediational analysis.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Robert L Stout; Molly Magill; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Predictors of longitudinal substance use and mental health outcomes for patients in two integrated service delivery systems.

Authors:  Christine E Grella; Judith A Stein; Constance Weisner; Felicia Chi; Rudolf Moos
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Sarah J Dow; Julie D Yeterian; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Does sponsorship improve outcomes above Alcoholics Anonymous attendance? A latent class growth curve analysis.

Authors:  Jane Witbrodt; Lee Kaskutas; Jason Bond; Kevin Delucchi
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  An exploration of the effect of on-site 12-step meetings on post-treatment outcomes among polysubstance-dependent outpatient clients.

Authors:  Alexandre Laudet; Virginia Stanick; Brian Sands
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2007-12

8.  Social recovery model: an 8-year investigation of adolescent 12-step group involvement following inpatient treatment.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Sandra A Brown; Ana Abrantes; Christopher W Kahler; Mark Myers
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Involvement in 12-step activities and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah E Zemore; Meenakshi Subbaraman; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  Attitudes towards 12-step groups and referral practices in a 12-step naive treatment culture; a survey of addiction professionals in Norway.

Authors:  John-Kåre Vederhus; Øistein Kristensen; Alexandre Laudet; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.