Literature DB >> 17207038

Using discrete choice experiments to investigate subject preferences for preventive asthma medication.

Emily J Lancsar1, Jane P Hall, Madeleine King, Patricia Kenny, Jordan J Louviere, Denzil G Fiebig, Ishrat Hossain, Francis C K Thien, Helen K Reddel, Christine R Jenkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Long-term adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor despite the crucial role of preventer medications in achieving good asthma outcomes. This study was undertaken to explore patient preferences in relation to their current inhaled corticosteroid medication, a hypothetical preventer or no medication.
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted in 57 adults with mild-moderate asthma and airway hyper-responsiveness, who were using inhaled corticosteroid <or=500 microg/day (beclomethasone equivalent). In the discrete choice experiment, subjects evaluated 16 hypothetical scenarios made up of 10 attributes that described the process and outcomes of taking asthma medication, with two to four levels for each attribute. For each scenario, subjects chose between the hypothetical medication, the medication they were currently taking and no asthma medication. A random parameter multinomial logit model was estimated to quantify subject preferences for the aspects of taking asthma medication and the influence of attributes on medication decisions.
RESULTS: Subjects consistently made choices in favour of being able to do strenuous and sporting activities with or without reliever, experiencing no side-effects and never having to monitor their peak flow. Frequency of collecting prescriptions, frequency of taking the medication, its route of administration and the strength of the doctor recommendation about the medication were not significant determinants of choice.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients prefer a preventer that confers capacity to maximize physical activity, has no side-effects and does not require daily peak flow monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207038     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.01005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  16 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  How does patients' quality of life guide their preferences regarding aspects of asthma therapy?: a patient-preference study using discrete-choice experiment methodology.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Emma McIntosh; Angela E Williams; Ad Kaptein; Klaus F Rabe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Sustainability of behavioral interventions: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Paul M Brown; Linda D Cameron; Steven Ramondt
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Joffre Swait
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data.

Authors:  Tracey-Lea Laba; Beverley Essue; Merel Kimman; Stephen Jan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patient preferences for treatment of achilles tendon pain: results from a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Kent R Sweeting; Jennifer A Whitty; Paul A Scuffham; Michael J Yelland
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar; Carol Armour; John M Rose; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett's Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Norma B Bulamu; Gang Chen; Tim Bright; Julie Ratcliffe; Adrian Chung; Robert J L Fraser; Björn Törnqvist; David I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.