Literature DB >> 17206656

Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in the protein-ligand interface.

Sunil K Panigrahi1, Gautam R Desiraju.   

Abstract

The characteristics of N--H...O, O--H...O, and C--H...O hydrogen bonds and other weak intermolecular interactions are analyzed in a large and diverse group of 251 protein-ligand complexes using a new computer program that was developed in-house for this purpose. The interactions examined in the present study are those which occur in the active sites, defined here as a sphere of 10 A radius around the ligand. Notably, N--H...O and O--H...O bonds tend towards linearity. Multifurcated interactions are especially common, especially multifurcated acceptors, and the average degree of furcation is 2.6 hydrogen bonds per furcated acceptor. A significant aspect of this study is that we have been able to assess the reliability of hydrogen bond geometry as a function of crystallographic resolution. Thresholds of 2.3 and 2.0 A are established for strong and weak hydrogen bonds, below which hydrogen bond geometries may be safely considered for detailed analysis. Interactions involving water as donor or acceptor, and C--H...O bonds with Gly and Tyr as donors are ubiquitous in the active site. A similar trend was observed in an external test set of 233 protein-ligand complexes belonging to the kinase family. Weaker interactions like X--H...pi (X = C, N, O) and those involving halogen atoms as electrophiles or nucleophiles have also been studied. We conclude that the strong and weak hydrogen bonds are ubiquitous in protein-ligand recognition, and that with suitable computational tools very large numbers of strong and weak intermolecular interactions in the ligand-protein interface may be analyzed reliably. Results confirm earlier trends reported previously by us but the extended nature of the present data set mean that the observed trends are more reliable. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17206656     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  54 in total

1.  NCIPLOT: a program for plotting non-covalent interaction regions.

Authors:  Julia Contreras-García; Erin R Johnson; Shahar Keinan; Robin Chaudret; Jean-Philip Piquemal; David N Beratan; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  A joint x-ray and neutron study on amicyanin reveals the role of protein dynamics in electron transfer.

Authors:  N Sukumar; F S Mathews; P Langan; V L Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular switch controlling the binding of anionic bile acid conjugates to human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter.

Authors:  Rana Rais; Chayan Acharya; Gasirat Tririya; Alexander D Mackerell; James E Polli
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  A graph theoretical approach for assessing bio-macromolecular complex structural stability.

Authors:  Carlos Adriel Del Carpio; Mihai Iulian Florea; Ai Suzuki; Hideyuki Tsuboi; Nozomu Hatakeyama; Akira Endou; Hiromitsu Takaba; Eiichiro Ichiishi; Akira Miyamoto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  An NMR strategy to detect conformational differences in a protein complexed with highly analogous inhibitors in solution.

Authors:  John D Persons; Shahid N Khan; Rieko Ishima
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Transcription of DNA containing the 5-guanidino-4-nitroimidazole lesion by human RNA polymerase II and bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Alexandra Dimitri; Lei Jia; Vladimir Shafirovich; Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde; David A Scicchitano
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-13

8.  Unconventional N-H…N Hydrogen Bonds Involving Proline Backbone Nitrogen in Protein Structures.

Authors:  R N V Krishna Deepak; Ramasubbu Sankararamakrishnan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in drug-DNA complexes: a statistical analysis.

Authors:  Sunil K Panigrahi; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Optimized hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding at the target-ligand interface leads the pathways of drug-designing.

Authors:  Rohan Patil; Suranjana Das; Ashley Stanley; Lumbani Yadav; Akulapalli Sudhakar; Ashok K Varma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.