Literature DB >> 17205908

Interspecific resource partitioning in sympatric ursids.

Jerrold L Belant1, Knut Kielland, Erich H Follmann, Layne G Adams.   

Abstract

The fundamental niche of a species is rarely if ever realized because the presence of other species restricts it to a narrower range of ecological conditions. The effects of this narrower range of conditions define how resources are partitioned. Resource partitioning has been inferred but not demonstrated previously for sympatric ursids. We estimated assimilated diet in relation to body condition (body fat and lean and total body mass) and reproduction for sympatric brown bears (Ursus arctos) and American black bears (U. americanus) in south-central Alaska, 1998-2000. Based on isotopic analysis of blood and keratin in claws, salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) predominated in brown bear diets (> 53% annually) whereas black bears assimilated 0-25% salmon annually. Black bears did not exploit salmon during a year with below average spawning numbers, probably because brown bears deterred black bear access to salmon. Proportion of salmon in assimilated diet was consistent across years for brown bears and represented the major portion of their diet. Body size of brown bears in the study area approached mean body size of several coastal brown bear populations, demonstrating the importance of salmon availability to body condition. Black bears occurred at a comparable density (mass:mass), but body condition varied and was related directly to the amount of salmon assimilated in their diet. Both species gained most lean body mass during spring and all body fat during summer when salmon were present. Improved body condition (i.e., increased percentage body fat) from salmon consumption reduced catabolism of lean body mass during hibernation, resulting in better body condition the following spring. Further, black bear reproduction was directly related to body condition; reproductive rates were reduced when body condition was lower. High body fat content across years for brown bears was reflected in consistently high reproductive levels. We suggest that the fundamental niche of black bears was constrained by brown bears through partitioning of food resources, which varied among years. Reduced exploitation of salmon caused black bears to rely more extensively on less reliable or nutritious food sources (e.g., moose [Alces alces], berries) resulting in lowered body condition and subsequent reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17205908     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2333:irpisu]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  13 in total

1.  Life in the fat lane: seasonal regulation of insulin sensitivity, food intake, and adipose biology in brown bears.

Authors:  K S Rigano; J L Gehring; B D Evans Hutzenbiler; A V Chen; O L Nelson; C A Vella; C T Robbins; H T Jansen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Fast carnivores and slow herbivores: differential foraging strategies among grizzly bears in the Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Mark A Edwards; Andrew E Derocher; Keith A Hobson; Marsha Branigan; John A Nagy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Isotopic evidence for omnivory among European cave bears: Late Pleistocene Ursus spelaeus from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania.

Authors:  Michael P Richards; Martina Pacher; Mathias Stiller; Jérôme Quilès; Michael Hofreiter; Silviu Constantin; João Zilhão; Erik Trinkaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The shared preference niche of sympatric Asiatic black bears and sun bears in a tropical forest mosaic.

Authors:  Robert Steinmetz; David L Garshelis; Wanlop Chutipong; Naret Seuaturien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Despotism and risk of infanticide influence grizzly bear den-site selection.

Authors:  Nathan S Libal; Jerrold L Belant; Bruce D Leopold; Guiming Wang; Patricia A Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stress and reproductive hormones in grizzly bears reflect nutritional benefits and social consequences of a salmon foraging niche.

Authors:  Heather M Bryan; Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Judit E G Smits
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predicting grizzly bear density in western North America.

Authors:  Garth Mowat; Douglas C Heard; Carl J Schwarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Indigenous knowledge and science unite to reveal spatial and temporal dimensions of distributional shift in wildlife of conservation concern.

Authors:  Christina N Service; Megan S Adams; Kyle A Artelle; Paul Paquet; Laura V Grant; Chris T Darimont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stress and reproductive hormones reflect inter-specific social and nutritional conditions mediated by resource availability in a bear-salmon system.

Authors:  Heather M Bryan; Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Judit E G Smits
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Sex, Diet, and the Social Environment: Factors Influencing Hair Cortisol Concentration in Free-Ranging Black Bears (Ursus americanus).

Authors:  Diana J R Lafferty; Mark L Laudenslager; Garth Mowat; Doug Heard; Jerrold L Belant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.