Literature DB >> 17205896

Denitrification and the nitrogen budget of a reservoir in an agricultural landscape.

Mark B David1, Lareina G Wall, Todd V Royer, Jennifer L Tank.   

Abstract

Denitrification is an important process in aquatic sediments, but its role has not been assessed in the N mass balance of upper-Midwestern (USA) reservoirs that receive large agricultural riverine N inputs. We used a 4400-ha reservoir to determine the role of denitrification in the N mass balance and effectiveness in reducing downstream transport of NO(3-)N. Sediment denitrification was (1) measured monthly (March 2002-March 2003) at eight sites in the Lake Shelbyville reservoir in central Illinois using the acetylene inhibition, chloramphenicol technique, (2) scaled to the overall reservoir and compared to N not accounted for in a mass balance, and (3) estimated indirectly using long-term (1981-2003) mass balances of N in the reservoir. Denitrification rates in the reservoir were high during spring and early summer of 2002, when maximum NO(3-)N concentrations were measured (10-14 mg NO(3-)N/L). We estimated that denitrification for the year was between 2580 and 5150 Mg N. Missing N from the mass balance was 3004 Mg N, suggesting that sediment denitrification was the sink. Areal rates of sediment denitrification in the reservoir ranged from 62 to 225 g N x m(-2) x yr(-1), with rates a function of both denitrification intensity (microg N x g dry mass x h(-1)) and the overall mass of sediment present. From 1981 to 2003 the average NO(3-)N inlet flux was 8900 Mg N/yr. About 58% of the total NO(3-)N input was removed, and annual NO(3-)N removed as a percentage of inputs was significantly related to reservoir retention time (average = 0.36 yr for the 23 years, range = 0.21-0.84 yr). By scaling denitrification in Lake Shelbyville to other reservoirs in Illinois, we estimated a sink of 48900 Mg N/yr. When combined with estimated in-stream denitrification, 60900 Mg N/yr was estimated to be removed by sediment denitrification. This reduces riverine export from Illinois to the Gulf of Mexico, where the flux during the 1990s was about 244000 Mg N/yr, and illustrates the importance of reservoir denitrification as an N sink in Midwestern agricultural landscapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17205896     DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2177:datnbo]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Trends in nutrient and sediment retention in Great Plains reservoirs (USA).

Authors:  Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha; Maria do Carmo Calijuri; Walter Kennedy Dodds
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Potential role of anammox in nitrogen removal in a freshwater reservoir, Jiulonghu Reservoir (China).

Authors:  Li-Dong Shen; Hai-Xiang Cheng; Xu Liu; Jian-Hui Li; Yan Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers.

Authors:  Elodie Passeport; Philippe Vidon; Kenneth J Forshay; Lora Harris; Sujay S Kaushal; Dorothy Q Kellogg; Julia Lazar; Paul Mayer; Emilie K Stander
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Nutrient Sources and Transport in the Missouri River Basin, with Emphasis on the Effects of Irrigation and Reservoirs.

Authors:  Juliane B Brown; Lori A Sprague; Jean A Dupree
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2011-08-22

5.  Nitrogen removal processes in lakes of different trophic states from on-site measurements and historic data.

Authors:  Beat Müller; Raoul Thoma; Kathrin B L Baumann; Cameron M Callbeck; Carsten J Schubert
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Thresholds of lake and reservoir connectivity in river networks control nitrogen removal.

Authors:  Noah M Schmadel; Judson W Harvey; Richard B Alexander; Gregory E Schwarz; Richard B Moore; Ken Eng; Jesus D Gomez-Velez; Elizabeth W Boyer; Durelle Scott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.