Literature DB >> 17205408

Comparison of virtual colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy in detection of colorectal polyps.

Doğan Selçuk1, Kemal Demirel, Harun Ozer, Bilgi Baca, Ibrahim Hatemi, Ismail Mihmanli, Uğur Korman, Gündüz Oğüt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of multidetector computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection by using conventional colonoscopy as the reference standard.
METHODS: 48 patients with high risk for colorectal cancer underwent virtual colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy. Examination results were compared with conventional colonoscopy, which served as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Virtual colonoscopy correctly depicted 19 of 22 polyps (sensitivity, 86%) that were detected in conventional colonoscopy. All 4 polyps that were greater than 10 mm in size (100%), 6 of 7 polyps 6-9 mm in size (85%), and 9 of 11 polyps 5 mm in size or smaller (81%) were correctly depicted with virtual colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy had an overall sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 98%.
CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy has excellent sensitivity for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17205408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  5 in total

1.  Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

2.  Screening methods for early detection of colorectal cancers and polyps: summary of evidence-based analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computed tomography colonography - reasons for different and false results.

Authors:  Małgorzata Rudzińska; Janusz Rudziński; Krzysztof Leksowski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2010-07

5.  Routine use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of primary colorectal cancer: does it affect clinical management?

Authors:  Gokhan Cipe; Nurhan Ergul; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Deniz Firat; Suleyman Bozkurt; Naim Memmi; Oguzhan Karatepe; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.