Literature DB >> 17205256

Digital photography in plastic surgery: how to achieve reasonable standardization outside a photographic studio.

Paolo Persichetti1, Pierfranco Simone, Marika Langella, Giovanni Francesco Marangi, Carlo Carusi.   

Abstract

Accurate photographic documentation has become essential in reconstructive and cosmetic plastic surgery both for clinical and scientific purposes. Digital imaging systems currently are popular, being reasonably affordable and much improved in quality. They offer multiple advantages in terms of quality, easy image storage and retrieval. Nevertheless, obtaining standardized, consistent, and relevant digital images is not easy outside a photographic studio. The purpose of this report is to define guidelines for accurate image capture in different anatomic areas, following elementary general criteria based on practical issues beyond the purely theoretical, to obtain reasonable standardization, consistency, and reproducibility.

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17205256     DOI： 10.1007/s00266-006-0125-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN： 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  13 in total

1.  Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality.

Authors:  Constance Boissin; Julian Fleming; Lee Wallis; Marie Hasselberg; Lucie Laflamme
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  A portable mirror stand for clinical facial photo documentation.

Authors:  Laureen Supit; Theddeus Oh Prasetyono
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

3.  A Simple, Versatile Device for Multiplanar Photography.

Authors:  Shogo Nagamatsu; Ayano Sasaki; Toshio Uchiki; Haruka Kawamoto; Kazunori Yokota
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-06-15

4.  Principles and practice of external digital photography in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Bipasha Mukherjee; Akshay Gopinathan Nair
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  eConsultation in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  M J Trovato; A J Scholer; E Vallejo; G M Buncke; M S Granick
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-11-30

6.  Pilot study of histology aspect of cellulite in seventy patients who differ in BMI and cellulite grading.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Morena Petrini; Andrea Sbarbati; Roberto Amore; Eugenio Luigi Iorio; Marco Marchetti; Domenico Amuso
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.189

7.  An innovative system for 3D clinical photography in the resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Saharnaz Baghdadchi; Kimberly Liu; Jacquelyn Knapp; Gabriel Prager; Susannah Graves; Kevan Akrami; Rolanda Manuel; Rui Bastos; Erin Reid; Dennis Carson; Sadik Esener; Joseph Carson; Yu-Tsueng Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes of breast reconstruction: Investigations into the correlation between the patients' Breast-Q outcome and the judgment of panels.

Authors:  Y Eltahir; E Bosma; N Teixeira; P M N Werker; G H de Bock
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2020-03-12

9.  A Short Introduction to Clinical Photography for the Plastic Surgeon.

Authors:  Shehab Jabir
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05

10.  Can We Reach a Consensus on the Appropriate Use of Before and After Photos in Breast Surgery?

Authors:  Chantal R Valiquette; Christopher R Forrest; Leila Kasrai; Kyle R Wanzel; Glykeria Martou; Brett A Beber; John L Semple; Thomas Constantine; Emily S Ho; Ron B Somogyi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.