Literature DB >> 17205218

Urethral pressure response patterns induced by squeeze in continent and incontinent women.

Pia M Teleman1, Anders Mattiasson.   

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the urethral pressure response pattern to pelvic floor muscle contractions in 20-27 years old, nulliparous continent women (n = 31) to that of continent (n = 28) and formerly untreated incontinent (n = 59) (53-63 years old) women. These women underwent urethral pressure measurements during rest and repeated pelvic muscle contractions. The response to the contractions was graded 0-4. The young continent women showed a mean urethral pressure response of 2.8, the middle-aged continent women 2.2 (NS vs young continent), and the incontinent women 1.5 (p < 0.05 vs middle-aged continent, p < 0.001 vs young continent). Urethral pressures during rest were significantly higher in the younger women than in both groups of middle-aged women. The decreased ability to increase urethral pressure on demand seen in middle-aged incontinent women compared to continent women of the same age as well as young women seems to be a consequence of a neuromuscular disorder rather than of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205218     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0284-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  19 in total

Review 1.  The innervation and properties of the urethral striated muscle.

Authors:  K E Creed; B A Van der Werf
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Urethral pressure measurement--problems and clinical value.

Authors:  G Lose
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2001

3.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Can women without visible pubococcygeal muscle in MR images still increase urethral closure pressures?

Authors:  Janis M Miller; Wolfgang H Umek; John O L Delancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Variations in urethral and bladder pressure during stress episodes in healthy women.

Authors:  P Thind; G Lose; L Jørgensen; H Colstrup
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-10

6.  Comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers.

Authors:  Andrew F Hundley; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

7.  Urodynamic characterisation of women with naive urinary incontinence: a population-based study in subjectively incontinent and healthy 53-63 years old women.

Authors:  Pia Teleman; Marianne Gunnarsson; Jonas Lidfeldt; Christina Nerbrand; Göran Samsioe; Anders Mattiasson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Female stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence are associated with a chronic and progressive pelvic floor/vaginal neuromuscular disorder: An investigation of 317 healthy and incontinent women using vaginal surface electromyography.

Authors:  M Gunnarsson; A Mattiasson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Can simultaneous perineal sonography and urethrocystometry help explain urethral pressure variations?

Authors:  G N Schaer; O R Koechli; B Schuessler; U Haller
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  A screening procedure detecting high-yield candidates for OGTT. The Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) study: a population based study of middle-aged Swedish women.

Authors:  J Lidfeldt; C Nerbrand; G Samsioe; B Scherstén; C D Agardh
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Influence of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and pelvic floor muscle training on urethral closure pressures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maria Zubieta; Rebecca L Carr; Marcus J Drake; Kari Bø
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Variables affecting maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) measurements.

Authors:  Bryan J Hill; Sarah Fletcher; Jeffrey Blume; Rony Adam; Renée Ward
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.